 | | RE: LDraw.org Tutorials - Categorization, Storage, Indexing, etc... —Bram Lambrecht
| | | | (...) Well, you could just use regular old HTML the way it was meant to be used: <H1-6></H1-6> for headers, and <p></p> for paragraphs and then use CSS and includes to make it fit the LDraw design... Or you could add an FTX interpretter to (...) (23 years ago, 30-Jan-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: LDraw.org Tutorials - Categorization, Storage, Indexing, etc... —Tim Courtney
| | | | | | (...) That's how the site works now, minus the <h1-6> tags. And, once a few other things get addressed - like the Download section updating, Variable-width tables on certain pages, etc, I'll address the <h1-6> issue of making headers. That will go (...) (23 years ago, 30-Jan-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | Re: LDraw.org Tutorials - Categorization, Storage, Indexing, etc... —Jimmy Figiel
| | | | | | | (...) I think that the shorthand abbreviations are much less cryptic than the single letters. Jimmy 8(:O)) (23 years ago, 30-Jan-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | Re: LDraw.org Tutorials - Categorization, Storage, Indexing, etc... —Ryan Farrington
| | | | | | (...) I think that either the four-letter abbreviations or the full words would be preferable. The four-letter abbreviations are easier to figure out and learn. Just my 2¢ --Ryan (23 years ago, 31-Jan-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: LDraw.org Tutorials - Categorization, Storage, Indexing, etc... —Steve Bliss
| | | | | (...) Don't forget the postrequisites![1] Also known as "where do I go from here?" or "What's next?" links. :) Steve 1) Not a real word, AFAIK. (23 years ago, 31-Jan-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| | | | | | |
