 | | Parts Tracker Status —Steve Bliss
| | | | After the site reorganization, I thought I should post an update on the Parts Tracker. Since yesterday, the Parts Tracker has been online and active. Everything seems to be running fine. There are a few layout details that still need to be resolved, (...) (23 years ago, 26-Jan-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Parts Tracker update frequency —Ross Crawford
| | | | | (...) Thanks for the update, Steve I think I'd prefer the "volume method", though it's not something I'd die for 8?) ROSCO (23 years ago, 28-Jan-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Parts Tracker update frequency —Ludo Soete
| | | | | (...) I prefer a regular update, on a month base or so. This has some advantages, as some parts will be faster released than on a volume base, and the files to download will be also less large than on a volume base. Anyhow, every method has his pro (...) (23 years ago, 28-Jan-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Parts Tracker update frequency —Carsten Schmitz
| | | | | Hello (...) advantages, (...) Yes.. i would agree to this method too... Sounds better to me! Play well Carsten (23 years ago, 28-Jan-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| | | | | | |
