 | | Re: New Feature Article - Progress in the LDraw Community... —Matthew Gerber
|
| | | Tim, Your article is well written and will hopefully quell some of the negative noise being made out there. Thank you for including LDMC, also. James and I are doing what we can to make LDMC a force to be reckoned with. Your help has been (...) (24 years ago, 2-May-01, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.cad)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: New Feature Article - Progress in the LDraw Community... —Tim Courtney
|
| | | | | "Matthew Gerber" <matthew@digitaliris.com> wrote in message news:GCq40n.9nB@lugnet.com... (...) Yep, hopefully. I wrote it to do that, and to inform everyone of what has happened and what we're planning on doing. (...) Hey - no problem! I love what (...) (24 years ago, 4-May-01, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.cad)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: New Feature Article - Progress in the LDraw Community... —Kyle D. Jackson
|
| | | | (...) I read the article and caught the mention of some kind of petition. I went to the LDMC site and couldn't find one. What's it about? The reason I ask is I thought it funny that there was a petition about something produced with volunteer (...) (24 years ago, 15-May-01, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.cad)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: New Feature Article - Progress in the LDraw Community... —Matthew Gerber
|
| | | | Hey Kyle, I guess the "petition" thing was a bit misleading, but it's no big deal really. It's just a holdover from the previous incarnation of the LDMC site, which James Reynolds and I are trying to get updated as time allows. What was really meant (...) (24 years ago, 15-May-01, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.cad)
|
| | | | |
