To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldrawOpen lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / Development / Organizations / LDraw / 1073
1072  |  1074
Subject: 
Re: Do we need public part submission information ?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw
Date: 
Thu, 26 Oct 2000 14:48:33 GMT
Viewed: 
475 times
  
In lugnet.cad, Manfred Moolhuysen wrote:

I've posted this message to the group CAD/Development/Organizations/LDraw
before, but got no response there. I try it a bit higher in the hierargy,
but set the follow-up back to cad.dev.org.ldraw, agreed ?

Sorry I didn't reply before -- I meant to!

I think we should put up a resource with some submission info somewhere.

Yes, and it should have a link on the main page of www.ldraw.org, and a
link (maybe more than one) from the news.lugnet.com/cad/dev/ page.

The link could say "Do your part!"

What about something similar to this:

I've added bits and made revisions below, marked with [ ].  Deletions are
unmarked, sorry.

1- Where to submit finished part for voting:

partsref@home.com

This is a special adress to submit dat-files, once you're convinced [they're] good
enough to withstand democratic forces. Also, this is the -only- place where
you can enter your dat-files to the voting process that might result in [their]
release as official parts.
It's generally a good idea to ask for a second opinion on your part before you
submit. The Lugnet discussion group cad.dat.parts is ideal for this purpose.
see http://news.lugnet.com/cad/dat/parts/.
Please remember we don't scan for [part submissions] on Lugnet. After
you've incorporated the remarks received there, you still have to submit your
part personally at the given E-mail adress.


2- Format of the obligatory part header:

0 <part description>
0 [Name: ]<part number>.dat
0 [Author: ]<Author>
0 U[no]fficial Element

Replace any <...> with the appropriate information. The length of the first
line, with the part description, may not exceed [65] characters, [not including]
the [leading] 0 and
space. The 'Unofficial' on the fourth line should always be as stated, to
indicate that the part hasn't been officialised yet. [The 'Element' on the fourth
line should be replaced with 'Primitive' or 'Subpart', when appropriate.]

When the part gets
included in a official update, the update manager will use th[e fourth] line to show
release information.


3- Terminate the file with a singe line only containing a 0 (zero) and no
linefeed.


Editorial notes:
Is 64 characters correct ?

It should be 66 characters -- the lines in parts.lst are limited to 80
characters, and the title starts in column 15.  But I believe mklist
truncates at 65 characters.

And perhaps some minimum required quality standards added, although I
personally would not know what to say there.

Maybe mention this, but quality standards belong in a separate document.

Steve



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Do we need public part submission information ?
 
(...) [snip] Your suggestions sounds like music to my ears, Steve. Greetings, M. Moolhuysen. (24 years ago, 26-Oct-00, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)

Message is in Reply To:
  Do we need public part submission information ?
 
Hello all, I've posted this message to the group CAD/Development/Orga...ions/LDraw before, but got no response there. I try it a bit higher in the hierargy, but set the follow-up back to cad.dev.org.ldraw, agreed ? I think we should put up a (...) (24 years ago, 25-Oct-00, to lugnet.cad)

8 Messages in This Thread:


Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR