 | | Motion to move the LSC elections passes
|
|
With a total of 12 voters who "agreed" and none who "disagreed", the Motion to move the LSC elections from July to October: Begin of motion ---...--- Recurring Dates * October 1 - Annual summary published. Call for nominations. * October 14 - All (...) (18 years ago, 1-Nov-06, to lugnet.announce, lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Non-CA parts rewrite
|
|
(...) I agree. Posted in Mar 2006 this was not a re-write for CA-purposes, but an improvement and BFC addition. The original author still deserves credit. Header edited . Chris (18 years ago, 31-Oct-06, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | RE: Non-CA parts rewrite
|
|
If I remember correctly, Guy's file uses a lot more primitives, etc, etc, etc than the original, so I would say add the credit to the file on the Tracker. Can the admins do this with a header edit? (18 years ago, 30-Oct-06, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Non-CA parts rewrite
|
|
(...) Use John's original work. Or add a credit for John to the new file. Steve (18 years ago, 30-Oct-06, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Non-CA parts rewrite
|
|
(...) We've got an affirmation from John Jensen for 2951.dat - Technic Bucket 10 x 8 but it looks like Guy Vivan was faster! The rewrite is already on the PT: (URL) and just needs to certified by the admins. Which action should be taken?? w. (18 years ago, 30-Oct-06, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Non-CA parts rewrite
|
|
(...) Submitted to PT admin (18 years ago, 22-Oct-06, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | LDraw.org is temporarely LDraw.org is temporarily not available
|
|
Hi, you might wonder why LDraw.org is currently showing just a blank page. We were upgrading to Postnuke .763 to support the new Postnuke theme templating engine when something went the wrong way. We are currently working to fix the problem and (...) (18 years ago, 19-Oct-06, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.announce)
|
| |
| | LSC adopts "de-facto" BFC standard as the draft standard
|
|
The LDraw Standards Committee (LSC) has adopted the "de-facto" Back Face Culling (BFC) standard ((URL) as their draft standard. We are now working on clarifying a few minor ambiguities in the draft standard so that it can be ratified as the official (...) (18 years ago, 15-Oct-06, to lugnet.announce, lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | LDraw.org MOTM/SOTM Relaunch
|
|
I'm pleased to announce the relaunch of LDraw.org's MOTM/SOTM contest. Moving the curatorship has caused some trouble, but now we are back on track and open submissions to MOTM/SOTM once again. Have a look at: (URL) the rules and submit you model or (...) (18 years ago, 14-Oct-06, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.announce, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Motion to move the LSC elections: Call for Ratification
|
|
Since the motion to move the LSC elections has been posted (URL) and publicly discussed, and since by peoples' silence, there appear to be no more lingering objections, the Steering Committee hereby calls for a community vote to ratify the motion (...) (18 years ago, 14-Oct-06, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.announce)
|
| |
| | Re: New parts header format validated by the LSC
|
|
LOL, I think it'll be totally free from bugs before I have even time to THINK about making new parts ;) Anyways, it's a relief that I don't have to worry about this too at the moment... CYA sometime next summer Cheers NB (18 years ago, 9-Oct-06, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Non-CA parts rewrite
|
|
(...) Submitted to admins (18 years ago, 8-Oct-06, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: New parts header format validated by the LSC
|
|
Niels Bugge schrieb: (...) You can give my new program DATHeader (Windows) a try to maintain the correct header. First Bug fixes are made, so I think it could be useful for you. cu MikeHeide (18 years ago, 8-Oct-06, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Motion to move the LSC elections: Call for Public Discussion and Consensus
|
|
(...) I have no objections to this change. One thing I would add would be a statement about the fact that the dates may flex a few days in either direction due to the personal schedules (read: real life events) of the site admins. -Orion (18 years ago, 8-Oct-06, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Motion to move the LSC elections: Call for Public Discussion and Consensus
|
|
(...) Thank you Willy for extending the time frames. /Lars (18 years ago, 7-Oct-06, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Motion to move the LSC elections: Call for Public Discussion and Consensus
|
|
(...) Shifting the dates from July/August to October/November makes sense to me, as the election then doesn't clash with summer holidays. I also have no objection to serving the extra three months this time around. William (18 years ago, 7-Oct-06, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: New parts header format validated by the LSC
|
|
(...) Yes, as an author you will need to worry about it for newly submitted parts, because the Parts Tracker submit process will start checking for adherence to this. We will take care of the existing officlal library and the files currently on the (...) (18 years ago, 7-Oct-06, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: New parts header format validated by the LSC
|
|
I'm sorry if this question has ben brought up in other threads, but I'm really streached thin with real life business at the moment and can't really follow the pt or lugnet (at least for the next half year). ...I'd just like to know if this header (...) (18 years ago, 6-Oct-06, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Parts Releases and the CA
|
|
With 1/3 of the non-ca parts in the library/tracker left to be re-written, the list of non-ca authors is as follows Name (number of parts authored) Chris Alano (5) Eric D'Aragon (1) Howard Lande (1) Kevin Bane (8) Luis E. Fernandez (10) Tim Romine (...) (18 years ago, 6-Oct-06, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Non-CA parts rewrite
|
|
In need of re-writing (total 33) Type Number PT? Name parts 2464.dat N Brick 3 x 3 x 2 Facet Bottom parts 2494p01.dat N Glass for Window 1 x 4 x 5 with 5 Stripes parts 2500c01.dat N Electric Light & Sound Brick 1 x 8 Front Lights parts 2542.dat N (...) (18 years ago, 6-Oct-06, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
