 | | Re: LSC - request for defining a WORKING connection database standard
|
|
(...) I would love to see a connection database for the LDraw system With that we might be able to make a simulator. This could be handy for test driving ideas as well as good for animations. Kevin (21 years ago, 19-Mar-04, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev.lcd, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: LSC - request for defining a WORKING connection database standard
|
|
(...) I like the idea of connections. I think it's really neat and would like to see it realised. I support asking LSC to look into this further. But I fear that requiring authors to submit a .cdl file might be increasing the barriers to entry for (...) (21 years ago, 19-Mar-04, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev.lcd, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | LSC - request for defining a WORKING connection database standard
|
|
dear LSC members, LEGO Digital Designer (URL) has only one feature I really miss in the LDraw system: the snap-in behavior. guys, I'd like to ask you - no I beg you down on my knees - to define a working standard for a connection database. there is (...) (21 years ago, 19-Mar-04, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev.lcd, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Any news about LCD and LMPL ?
|
|
(...) Things that are unapplicable for a specific part (model, object etc.) should not be used with it. For example, you can't rotate an Axle--Axlehole connection because it can slide only. Therefore, all statements, functions and properties related (...) (21 years ago, 12-Mar-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.lcd, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Numbers Report - 11 March 2004
|
|
(...) As I tried to explain here (URL) a "numbers report" in the midst of a parts update is meaningless, and you have carried the biased 2004-03-02 counts forward into this report. During the parts update a whole slew of files get temporarily held (...) (21 years ago, 12-Mar-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
