 | | Re: 1st LSC: Call for Nominations
|
|
(...) Tim: I was wondering what was happening to LSC effort, and here I discover there was yet another newsgroup that I should have been subscribed to. I'll spend later tonight catching up on what I've missed. With regards to the LSC nomination, as (...) (21 years ago, 2-Jul-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: 1st LSC: Call for Nominations
|
|
(...) I also nominate: Paul Easter -Orion (21 years ago, 2-Jul-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: 1st LSC: Call for Nominations
|
|
(...) Thanks. I accept - Chris (21 years ago, 2-Jul-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: 1st LSC: Call for Nominations
|
|
(...) Just in case volunteering isn't sufficient: I nominate: - Orion Pobursky - Kevin Clague Presumably their having volunteered counts as accepting their nominations. :-) --Travis Cobbs (21 years ago, 2-Jul-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: 1st LSC: Call for Nominations
|
|
(...) I second. (...) And accept. Play well, Jacob (21 years ago, 2-Jul-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Nominees - Please Accept or Decline Nomination (was Re: 1st LSC: Call for Nominations)
|
|
Nominees - I forgot to add in the original post, please accept or decline your nomination in this thread as well. -Tim (21 years ago, 2-Jul-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: 1st LSC: Call for Nominations
|
|
(...) Whoops - brain fart - I am not sure Wayne meets the requirements. I'll ask him. -Tim (21 years ago, 2-Jul-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: 1st LSC: Call for Nominations
|
|
I nominate: - Wayne Gramlich - Paul Gyugyi - Lars Hassing -Tim (21 years ago, 2-Jul-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: 1st LSC: Call for Nominations
|
|
Quoting Dan Boger <dan@peeron.com>: (...) I second. (21 years ago, 2-Jul-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: 1st LSC: Call for Nominations
|
|
I nominate: - Steve Bliss - Chris Dee - Jacob Sparre Andersen (21 years ago, 2-Jul-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: 1st LSC: Call for Nominations
|
|
(...) I was going to nominate Orion, but he beat me to it. I volunteer. (...) Kevin Clague (21 years ago, 2-Jul-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: 1st LSC: Call for Nominations
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Tim Courtney wrote: <snip> Well I volunteered before, so I volunteer now. --Orion Pobursky (21 years ago, 2-Jul-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | 1st LSC: Call for Nominations
|
|
All - Now is the time for the call for nominations for the first LSC. If you're not familiar with the LSC, please read the latest proposal: (URL) [1] The way I am reading things at this point, we don't need a formal nomination structure this (...) (21 years ago, 2-Jul-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | formatting errors in FTX?? (wa Re: LSC Proposal 0.99a
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Tim Courtney wrote: I like this draft a lot however there seem to be some word lossages here and there... the tail end of some phrases are missing, and I think it may be due to the FTX formatting??? for example: On the (...) (21 years ago, 1-Jul-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | LSC Proposal 0.99a
|
|
This is a re-post of the LSC proposal 0.99 with two changes: I removed the stipulation under 'voting' about the ad-hoc committee per (URL) this thread>. I changed the dates for voting from one day (July 20) to five days, July 17-22. This covers both (...) (21 years ago, 1-Jul-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Status of the LDRaw.org contest?
|
|
(...) I think that the problem is related to the move from the NBI to the Peeron server. Not all scripts were transfered since the same functionality is available in the CMS the LDraw.org site is switching to. Play well, Jacob (who is irresponsible (...) (21 years ago, 23-Jun-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Status of the LDRaw.org contest?
|
|
Hi! I just would like to know if there may be a contest in the enar future. The last (supposed to be monthly) contest was held in February? What is wrong atm? Play well Carsten (21 years ago, 20-Jun-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: LDDP open source project: Source code released!
|
|
(...) If it helps any, this CVS client claims to be easier to use for Windows developers. Plus it has a cute mascot. (URL) (21 years ago, 25-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | LDDP open source project: Source code released!
|
|
Hi! I just want everyone to know that I just uploaded the LDraw DesignPad Delphi sourcecode into the CVS branch at (URL) . Please be aware that the sourcecode is offered under the GPL license. Next steps in development will be: - Linux version of (...) (21 years ago, 24-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Status of LDDP open source release
|
|
(...) I didn't know kylix/delphi wasn't available on Mac OS X. Oops, my bad. Several X11 implentations are available on Mac OS X though, if that is what you mean by visual environment. Oh well. Guess there is always Virtual PC. That's better than (...) (21 years ago, 20-May-03, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Status of LDDP open source release
|
|
Ell.. Since there is Linux for Mac available it would be a way to run it on Mac that way. Problem is that you dont need 'just a pascal' compiler but the complete visial enviroment and that isn't available on the Mac platform in any form. Play well (...) (21 years ago, 20-May-03, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Status of LDDP open source release
|
|
(...) I imagine that's because kylix/delphi doesn't exist on OS X, because with a sourceforge project, LDDP programmers would have access to the sourceforge compile farm (which includes a OS X box). However, once the source is available perhaps (...) (21 years ago, 19-May-03, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Status of LDDP open source release
|
|
Hello! (...) Well.. since there is no platform on Mac we would be able to compile it on there eventually won't. I dont know if there exists some kind of emulator (Linux or Windows) for Mac.. maybe that would be an alternative. But there will be for (...) (21 years ago, 19-May-03, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Status of LDDP open source release
|
|
(...) James (21 years ago, 19-May-03, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: LSC Proposal 0.99
|
|
(...) Orion, Sorry for getting your hopes up. What I mean above is that I jumped the gun. Yesterday, I misunderstood Tim Courtney and Dan Boger in what they wrote here: (2 URLs) was proceeding under the general impression that it would occur, (...) (21 years ago, 17-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: LSC Proposal 0.99
|
|
(...) What are you talking about Todd? I for one would like the list mirrored here. -Orion (21 years ago, 17-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: LSC Proposal 0.99
|
|
(...) Never mind... It sounds as though the LDraw-tech folks really don't want their list mirrored here. --Todd (21 years ago, 17-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Status of LDDP open source release
|
|
Hello! Some time ago I talked of creating an open source project for LDraw Design Pad , short LDDP. I created a project on sourceforge.net and uploaded the last release to the file system. (URL) know of some people they would be interested to bring (...) (21 years ago, 17-May-03, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: LSC Proposal 0.99
|
|
(...) I think both LDraw.org and the community at large would benefit from it being mirrored. And another beauty of mirroring an archive like this is that it's so easy to set up that even if there's not a perceived burning need for it, the long-term (...) (21 years ago, 17-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: mailing list linkage
|
|
(...) Oh, that's a good point. Yes, it's a bit long, but as Steve points out, it's a relatively low-interest group. Putting it as .ldraw.tech instead of .ldraw-tech also makes it cleaner if other lists (such as, say, Tim's ldraw-siggraph list) (...) (21 years ago, 17-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: LSC Proposal 0.99
|
|
(...) This sounds like a cool idea, but I don't think there's a need for it right now. The techies list is kinda low-interest -- it's good to have a public archive of the list (which we've already got), but I don't see a burning need to mirror it (...) (21 years ago, 17-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: mailing list linkage
|
|
(...) I think lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw.tech is long but it fits in with the existing scheme -Orion (21 years ago, 17-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: mailing list linkage
|
|
(...) Cool. Hmm, which to choose... It makes less work for me doing it the mailing list way, because of the incoming gateway translations at the e-mail level. What do we want to call it here? lugnet.cad.ldraw-tech? lugnet.cad.ldraw.tech? --Todd (21 years ago, 17-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: mailing list linkage
|
|
(...) we can easily also tell mailman to post each email to the mailing list to a group on the NNTP server. Dan (21 years ago, 17-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: LSC Proposal 0.99
|
|
(...) I would rephrase that... under the most prevalent current limitation scheme being floated, (LSC eligible==LSC voting eligible) you would not be able to, and I would barely squeak by. Certainly other schemes could be floated, with different (...) (21 years ago, 16-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | mailing list linkage
|
|
(...) Aha -- yes, that would work too -- and is extremely easy to set up. In fact, if you wanted to make it read-only on LUGNET (so that the only way to post is via the mailing list on ldraw.org), all we need to do is subscribe an address (...) (21 years ago, 16-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Building LDGLite for off-screen rendering only (Was: Parts Tracker Status)
|
|
[ XFUT lugnet.cad.dev ] (...) So far it works fine, but ... (...) This fails. Here's the end of the output from the build: ---...--- gcc -g -DUNIX -DUSE_OPENGL -DUSE_L3_PARSER -DUSE_BMP8 -DNEED_MIN_MAX -DUSE_PNG -DTILE_RENDER_OPTION -DOSMESA_OPTION (...) (21 years ago, 16-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw-tech Mailing List/Update
|
|
(...) (URL) is the archives. -Tim (21 years ago, 16-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | LDraw-tech Mailing List/Update
|
|
Everyone - I noted the existance of the LDraw-tech mailing list in this LDraw.org article: (URL) never noted it on LUGNET. So... While we were recovering from the downtime, Dan and Steve set up the tech mailing list, to keep everyone involved on (...) (21 years ago, 16-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Parts Tracker Status (offscreen part rendering)
|
|
(...) Or you could build and link with static versions of the Mesa libraries. Then you just have to worry about the one executable. In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Don Heyse writes: (...) Ok, I tried this and it seems to work. Here's how: Grab the (...) (21 years ago, 15-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.cad)
|
