 | | Re: MOTM voting for February
|
|
Perhaps in the future could could we also have a contest where the actual .dat or .mpd file is available for viewing? I don't think the robotarm stands a very good chance of winning because it's not the best rendering but perhaps a technical (...) (24 years ago, 25-Jan-01, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: MOTM voting for February
|
|
"Steve Bliss" <steve.bliss@home.com> wrote in message news:a0p07ts361v0md6...4ax.com... (...) Yeah...I thought of that. Different people see it different ways - I started MOTM to showcase a good 3D rendering on the front page, to display potential (...) (24 years ago, 25-Jan-01, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: MOTM voting for February
|
|
(...) That's a nice quote to point out the different POV's between the people running a contest and the people entering the contest. Steve (24 years ago, 25-Jan-01, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: MOTM voting for February
|
|
"Brad Hamilton" <bhamilto1@home.com> wrote in message news:G7pAup.B5u@lugnet.com... (...) Same here! I just have to quit gawking and think 'what will look the best on the front page?' because that's the point of the contest :) -Tim (24 years ago, 25-Jan-01, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: MOTM voting for February
|
|
There is an excellent selection this month! It took me about 10 minutes to decide on my vote. Tim Courtney <tim@zacktron.com> wrote in message news:G7orCs.7oH@lugnet.com... (...) news:G7oMqH.GtD@lugnet.com... (...) I've (...) for my (...) (24 years ago, 25-Jan-01, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: MOTM voting for February
|
|
"Terry K" <legoverse@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:G7oMqH.GtD@lugnet.com... (...) DUUDE...this is going to be tough! These are some of the best renderings I've seen up period (and I'm not referring to my entry). I doubt I could vote for my own (...) (24 years ago, 24-Jan-01, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | MOTM voting for February
|
|
Salutations virtual brickheads, Voting for the ldraw.org MOTM is now up and running; (URL) intriguing variety this time 'round. -- Terry K -- (24 years ago, 24-Jan-01, to lugnet.announce, lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw.org Reference Organization Questions
|
|
Ryan Farrington <ryanjf@ifriendly.com> wrote in message news:004801c07f19$ad...dly.com... (...) Ryan - Thanks for the help. I just plugged that into Dreamweaver to preview it and I like what I see. A couple things which I'll have to work out later: (...) (24 years ago, 15-Jan-01, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw.org Reference Organization Questions
|
|
(...) to (...) Tim, here's some html I threw together for you for the main /reference/ page. --Ryan <html> <head> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1"> <meta name="GENERATOR" content="Microsoft FrontPage Express (...) (24 years ago, 15-Jan-01, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw.org Reference Organization Questions
|
|
On Fri, 12 Jan 2001 20:40:25 -0700, Tim Courtney wrote (in message <G730q1.FHo@lugnet.com>): (...) Sounds good to me, Tim. I think it's important to have a good explanation of the differences on your index page, just to avoid causing any confusion. (...) (24 years ago, 14-Jan-01, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.cad)
|
