|
 | | Re: Is the LDraw parts database free?
|
| (...) You forgot that there's a DOS emulator for Unix and you don't need to run the .EXE files, they are ARJ self extracting archives so running "arj x file.exe" will extract the files as well (and arj can be easily found for Linux systems, it's (...) (25 years ago, 16-Nov-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|  
ldraw
(score: 0.177)
|
|
| | Re: Problems with Ldraw related sites
|
| Manfred: (...) [...] It is my fault. I tried to optimise the web server, and forgot to check if everything worked after the change. It should have been fixed now. Play well, Jacob ---...--- -- E-mail: sparre@cats.nbi.dk -- -- Web...: <URL:(URL) -- (...) (25 years ago, 16-Nov-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.177)
|
|
| | Re: Line in the Sand
|
| Steve: (...) [...] It is definitely a useable option. How will the specification document look then? If it is easier to read that way, then you have one proponent for that solution. Play well, Jacob ---...--- -- E-mail: sparre@cats.nbi.dk -- -- (...) (25 years ago, 19-Nov-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.177)
|
|
| | Re: Part number for crystal in Rock Raider sets?
|
| Steve Bliss <blisses@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message news:xrgyOJpVudlFIjV...4ax.com... (...) numbers (...) number (...) me (...) This is a perfect opportunity for the LCAD community to give a HUGE round of applause to Terry Keller for his (...) (25 years ago, 17-Nov-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.176)
|
|
| | Questions on part #2865 - Train Track 9V Straight.
|
| Hello all, I've noticed there is a mockup file being passed around, wich proofs there is a definite need for an official part #2865 - Train Track 9V Straight. Hmm.. it's a nice difficult one. Would you please answer the following questions: 1. Has (...) (25 years ago, 17-Nov-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.176)
|
|
| | Problem with the LDraw Parts Tracker
|
| Hello all, Boys and girs, I'm having a problem with the LDraw Parts Tracker. The link towards the "Tracked Parts" page still works, although only the text part of the page comes up. I don't get the seegreen background I've been used to see there (...) (25 years ago, 9-Nov-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.176)
|
|
| | Planned downtime for ldraw.org
|
| www.ldraw.org and hugin.ldraw.org will be off-line for 10-15 minutes Monday 25th of October. It will happen sometime between 06 and 16 UTC, when the machine is moved to another location (just next door). Play well, Jacob ---...--- -- E-mail: (...) (25 years ago, 22-Oct-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.176)
|
|
| | Re: Line in the Sand
|
| Steve: (...) I _don't_ think CERTIFY should be dropped, but we might want to change it to "EXTENSIONS", since it is intended for listing which extensions to the LDraw language the file contains. (...) Yes. Play well, Jacob ---...--- -- E-mail: (...) (25 years ago, 13-Nov-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.176)
|
|
| | Re: Line in the Sand
|
| [ Still discussing (URL) ] Steve: (...) You=anyone (kind of - English is a very imprecise language - "on" in French, "man" in Danish, ...) (...) That depends on how the program is written. You could imagine that the variable "local_clipping" isn't (...) (25 years ago, 13-Nov-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.176)
|
|
| | Re: Line in the Sand
|
| [ Still discussing (URL) ] Steve: (...) [...] (...) "INVERTNEXT" is good. It makes the effect much more clear. (...) It gets much too messy when you mix the states of a parameter and the setting of that parameter. CERTIFY BFC does imply CLIPPING ON, (...) (25 years ago, 11-Nov-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.176)
|
|
| | Re: Line in the Sand
|
| Steve: (...) [...] (...) ...with the inversion status. (...) Yes. You might want to change "INVERT" to "INVERTNEXT". Play well, Jacob ---...--- -- E-mail: sparre@cats.nbi.dk -- -- Web...: <URL:(URL) -- ---...--- (25 years ago, 11-Nov-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.176)
|
|
| | Re: Line in the Sand
|
| Steve: (...) Yes. (...) The argument against should be that it complicates the rendering significantly, but I don't think it does. Play well, Jacob ---...--- -- E-mail: sparre@cats.nbi.dk -- -- Web...: <URL:(URL) -- ---...--- (25 years ago, 10-Nov-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.176)
|
|
| | Re: [ldraw.org] Model of the Month
|
| (...) Yeah there's some stiff competition, from the stats as of now it looks like two or three of the models will be competing neck-and-neck (I won't say which ones). Jeff, your A-Wing model *does* rock :) (...) Hee... Um, I forgot to announce it I (...) (25 years ago, 27-Oct-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.general)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.176)
|
|
| | Re: Line in the Sand
|
| Steve Bliss wrote... (...) the (...) allow (...) OFF (...) they (...) reference (...) CLIPPING (...) Good point! (...) Or you could write: 0 CERTIFY BFC | 0 CERTIFY NOBFC 0 WINDING CW | 0 WINDING CCW | 0 WINDING UNKNOWN (I don't think "0 WINDING" (...) (25 years ago, 10-Nov-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.176)
|
|
| | Re: Line in the Sand
|
| [ Still discussing (URL) ] Rui: (...) Yes, but generally it is no big deal to certify a model file - and there is the suggested option for the renderers mentioned further down for the lazy. (...) Yes, but we aren't all that stupid. We will of cause (...) (25 years ago, 9-Nov-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.175)
|
|
| | Update 9906?
|
| Hi! When is the next parts update going to be posted for official download? ldraw.org and the mirror site show 9905 as the last official update. Voting for 9906 was completed in August wasn't it? Just curious...not impatient. Thanks, Adam (25 years ago, 7-Nov-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.175)
|
|
| | Re: Update 9906?
|
| [ XFUT lugnet.cad ] Adam Howard asked when the next parts update will show up. Terry has been much too busy lately, to work on the parts update (or play with LEGO for that matter), so he has handed the task of preparing the parts updates over to (...) (25 years ago, 7-Nov-99, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.175)
|
|
| | Re: Line in the Sand
|
| Steve: I have a small linguistic correction, but except for that, I consider the document finished: There will be a few requirements placed on the design of rendering programs, in order to achieve correct renderings. Any program should may violate (...) (25 years ago, 6-Nov-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.175)
|
|
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.175)
|
|
| | Re: Line in the Sand
|
| Steve: (...) I think it is ready, but I will print out a copy, and check it tonight. Play well, Jacob ---...--- -- E-mail: sparre@cats.nbi.dk -- -- Web...: <URL:(URL) -- ---...--- (25 years ago, 5-Nov-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.175)
|
