 | | Re: Change to existing policy regarding the subfiling of dithered colors
|
|
(...) Just to be clear - you do not have to make a subpart of the pattern; that's the change in policy. Steve (20 years ago, 4-Jan-05, to lugnet.cad.dev, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Change to existing policy regarding the subfiling of dithered colors
|
|
I'll resubmit the part unchanged, if your hold vote is not deleted by midnight CET... (URL) (20 years ago, 4-Jan-05, to lugnet.cad.dev, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Change to existing policy regarding the subfiling of dithered colors
|
|
(...) See? Wasn't that easy? :) Steve (20 years ago, 4-Jan-05, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Change to existing policy regarding the subfiling of dithered colors
|
|
(...) Hard core reviewers know this already, of course, but those of us who don't review as much can use this link (URL) to find reviews they've done, including all the holds, so they can see if they are holding anything for dithering... (20 years ago, 4-Jan-05, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Change to existing policy regarding the subfiling of dithered colors
|
|
(...) To be honest, I suspect that if you aren't a hard-core reviewer, you're probably not holding anything due to dithering. Maybe I'm just being cynical, though. --Travis Cobbs (20 years ago, 4-Jan-05, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Change to existing policy regarding the subfiling of dithered colors
|
|
(...) Maybe. I think I was in the past and I wanted to go check that I wasn't, so I thought I'd post the link, just in case. (20 years ago, 4-Jan-05, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
