 | | Re: Change to existing policy regarding the subfiling of dithered colors —Jan Folkersma
|
| | | Question: what to do with 'hold' votes based upon the old policy? Good work! Jan Folkersma (20 years ago, 4-Jan-05, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Change to existing policy regarding the subfiling of dithered colors —Orion Pobursky
|
| | | | (...) Are there any holds based on this? Presumably we can just resubmit these parts to reset the votes. -Orion (20 years ago, 4-Jan-05, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Change to existing policy regarding the subfiling of dithered colors —Jan Folkersma
|
| | | | | yes, mine: (URL) I guess I'll have to go through the hassle of re-submitting this and on the way make a subpart of the pattern.... *sigh* :) thx! (20 years ago, 4-Jan-05, to lugnet.cad.dev, FTX)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Change to existing policy regarding the subfiling of dithered colors —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | | | (...) Just to be clear - you do not have to make a subpart of the pattern; that's the change in policy. Steve (20 years ago, 4-Jan-05, to lugnet.cad.dev, FTX)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Change to existing policy regarding the subfiling of dithered colors —Jan Folkersma
|
| | | | | | I'll resubmit the part unchanged, if your hold vote is not deleted by midnight CET... (URL) (20 years ago, 4-Jan-05, to lugnet.cad.dev, FTX)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Change to existing policy regarding the subfiling of dithered colors —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | | | (...) See? Wasn't that easy? :) Steve (20 years ago, 4-Jan-05, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Change to existing policy regarding the subfiling of dithered colors —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | | (...) Hard core reviewers know this already, of course, but those of us who don't review as much can use this link (URL) to find reviews they've done, including all the holds, so they can see if they are holding anything for dithering... (20 years ago, 4-Jan-05, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Change to existing policy regarding the subfiling of dithered colors —Travis Cobbs
|
| | | | | | (...) To be honest, I suspect that if you aren't a hard-core reviewer, you're probably not holding anything due to dithering. Maybe I'm just being cynical, though. --Travis Cobbs (20 years ago, 4-Jan-05, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Change to existing policy regarding the subfiling of dithered colors —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | | (...) Maybe. I think I was in the past and I wanted to go check that I wasn't, so I thought I'd post the link, just in case. (20 years ago, 4-Jan-05, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Change to existing policy regarding the subfiling of dithered colors —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | (...) Resubmitting (unchanged) files to simply clear away holds is *not* an approved practice for the PT. I'm not saying it isn't justified in this case, but it's not generally the way to operate - it undermines the the system. The more appropriate (...) (20 years ago, 4-Jan-05, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | |
