 | | Re: LDGlite and LPub (and maybe ldview?
|
|
Note that I'm sending followups to lugnet.cad.dev. (...) All I did was create an HTML document real quick and looked at it in Firefox. The following is the content of that document: <HTML> <HEAD> </HEAD> <BODY BGCOLOR="#FF0000"> <IMG (...) (20 years ago, 14-Oct-04, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: ptreleases.cgi - Ready to Roll?
|
|
(...) It works for me, and I don't remember anyone saying they're using the old one (other than myself), so I say go for it and make it official. This will kill that functionality in the private LDView 3 Alpha that a few people have, but that (...) (20 years ago, 14-Oct-04, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | ptreleases.cgi - Ready to Roll?
|
|
A couple of months ago, there were a number of changes implemented for the ptreleases.cgi script, but they were never confirmed and put in place as the final version. The latest cgi is available at (URL). To see a list of all the options, try (URL). (...) (20 years ago, 14-Oct-04, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: LPub mask generation
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev, Kevin L. Clague wrote: [ ... snipped ... ] (...) Awesome. When you have a build you think is stable enough please let me know and I will put it to the test! Thanks for continuing to work on this for me. Mike (20 years ago, 13-Oct-04, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: LPub mask generation
|
|
(...) I remembered that the issue we ran across at BrickFest was a simple one, but I couldn't remember the specifics. The fix is a two character fix. I forgot to put a semicolon after AMB and DIFF in the POV-File. Right now I'm running through your (...) (20 years ago, 13-Oct-04, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Idea for a new feature in a Lego CAD program.
|
|
(...) Sounds good.. But i would like to see some technic compatability as well.. Technic pieces are the hardest to position. Thank you, though. :) (20 years ago, 9-Oct-04, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Idea for a new feature in a Lego CAD program.
|
|
(...) BlockCAD (see sig.) has snapping. In fact it's impossible to put parts inside each other there. OTOH, BlockCAD has many other limitations (studs up only, 90 degrees turning only, limited part library) so it's usability depends on what you are (...) (20 years ago, 9-Oct-04, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Idea for a new feature in a Lego CAD program.
|
|
(...) Wonderful. Glad to see someone already thought about this and is implementing it into a working program. Thanks for the information, Travis. :) (20 years ago, 9-Oct-04, to lugnet.cad.dev, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Idea for a new feature in a Lego CAD program.
|
|
This has been talked about in the past. There's even a lugnet group devoted entirely to one of the proposals: (URL). I believe that the author of the Glide app is the only person to announce an intention of producing an LCD-based implementation. I (...) (20 years ago, 8-Oct-04, to lugnet.cad.dev, FTX)
|
| |
| | Idea for a new feature in a Lego CAD program.
|
|
I was thinking about how difficult it is to build things in MLCad. It's not technically difficult to build them, but it is difficult to position things properly. Even when you think you have a piece positioned properly, it ends up coming out wrong (...) (20 years ago, 8-Oct-04, to lugnet.cad.dev, FTX)
|
