To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cad.devOpen lugnet.cad.dev in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / Development / 9902
9901  |  9903
Subject: 
Re: Idea for a new feature in a Lego CAD program.
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.cad.dev
Date: 
Sat, 9 Oct 2004 23:34:37 GMT
Viewed: 
1829 times
  
In lugnet.cad.dev, Anders Isaksson wrote:
Cory wrote:
I was thinking about how difficult it is to build things in MLCad.
It's not technically difficult to [build] them, but it [is] difficult
to position things properly.

BlockCAD (see sig.) has snapping. In fact it's impossible to put parts
inside each other there. OTOH, BlockCAD has many other limitations (studs up
only, 90 degrees turning only, limited part library) so it's usability
depends on what you are building.

BlockCAD is best suited for buildings, less so for vehicles, and not at all
for Technic.

A BlockCAD model can be saved in LDRAW format, so you can start (quickly!)
in BlockCAD, and do the final touches in MLCad.

Sounds good.. But i would like to see some technic compatability as well..
Technic pieces are the hardest to position. Thank you, though. :)



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Idea for a new feature in a Lego CAD program.
 
(...) BlockCAD (see sig.) has snapping. In fact it's impossible to put parts inside each other there. OTOH, BlockCAD has many other limitations (studs up only, 90 degrees turning only, limited part library) so it's usability depends on what you are (...) (20 years ago, 9-Oct-04, to lugnet.cad.dev)

5 Messages in This Thread:


Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR