 | | Idea for a new feature in a Lego CAD program. —Cory Barker
|
| | | I was thinking about how difficult it is to build things in MLCad. It's not technically difficult to build them, but it is difficult to position things properly. Even when you think you have a piece positioned properly, it ends up coming out wrong (...) (20 years ago, 8-Oct-04, to lugnet.cad.dev, FTX)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Idea for a new feature in a Lego CAD program. —Travis Cobbs
|
| | | | | This has been talked about in the past. There's even a lugnet group devoted entirely to one of the proposals: (URL). I believe that the author of the Glide app is the only person to announce an intention of producing an LCD-based implementation. I (...) (20 years ago, 8-Oct-04, to lugnet.cad.dev, FTX)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Idea for a new feature in a Lego CAD program. —Cory Barker
|
| | | | | | (...) Wonderful. Glad to see someone already thought about this and is implementing it into a working program. Thanks for the information, Travis. :) (20 years ago, 9-Oct-04, to lugnet.cad.dev, FTX)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Idea for a new feature in a Lego CAD program. —Anders Isaksson
|
| | | | (...) BlockCAD (see sig.) has snapping. In fact it's impossible to put parts inside each other there. OTOH, BlockCAD has many other limitations (studs up only, 90 degrees turning only, limited part library) so it's usability depends on what you are (...) (20 years ago, 9-Oct-04, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Idea for a new feature in a Lego CAD program. —Cory Barker
|
| | | | (...) Sounds good.. But i would like to see some technic compatability as well.. Technic pieces are the hardest to position. Thank you, though. :) (20 years ago, 9-Oct-04, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | |
