 | | L3PPARTS (Was: Re: Change to existing policy on embedding POV-Ray code in Official Files) —Lars C. Hassing
|
| | | (...) Yeah, well, it's been three years since the last L3P release, so I guess it's about time for another :-) The current v1.3 release has proven to be quite stable, so I have just collected and implemented a list of wishes from various users. (...) (21 years ago, 29-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: L3PPARTS (Was: Re: Change to existing policy on embedding POV-Ray code in Official Files) —Chuck Sommerville
|
| | | | | I Like it :) It is a great solution to a sticky problem. -Chuck (21 years ago, 29-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: L3PPARTS (Was: Re: Change to existing policy on embedding POV-Ray code in Official Files) —Niels Karsdorp
|
| | | | | | (...) Me, too. This also solves an issue for having .dat files not too detailed, like the rounded metal parts on 12V train conductor parts. Now the .dat files can contain a square box, which is fast drawn in construction programs and the .inc files (...) (21 years ago, 30-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: L3PPARTS (Was: Re: Change to existing policy on embedding POV-Ray code in Official Files) —Ross Crawford
|
| | | | (...) [snip] (...) I think it's a good idea! The only thing I think needs looking at is the naming - should it be dedicated to L3P or to the renderer, eg: RENDERPARTS\POVRAY RENDERPARTS\BRYCE etc. That way, people can provide their own program to do (...) (21 years ago, 30-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | |
