Subject:
|
Re: Default extensions
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Tue, 30 Mar 1999 02:38:15 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
821 times
|
| |
|
|
On Mon, 29 Mar 1999 16:03:52 GMT, blisses@worldnet.att.net (Steve Bliss) wrote:
> Is anyone else bugged by the DAT extension? Does anyone else use other
> extensions for various flavors of (near-)LDraw source files?
>
> I stick with DAT for vanilla LDraw files. For other files files, I've been
> using:
>
> LDL - LDLite extensions (especially if I 'm going to eventually convert the
> file to vanilla LDraw).
> LDS - LDScript source.
>
> I'd use LDR instead of DAT for vanilla LDraw files, but DAT is too
> well-established as a default. Unfortunately, it's also very widely-used
> as the extension for miscellaneous data files.
>
> Steve
Yeah, I think it was an unfortunate choice to use DAT. It is way to common.
LDR would have been a better choice. But I just live with it.
-- Terry K --
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Default extensions
|
| Is anyone else bugged by the DAT extension? Does anyone else use other extensions for various flavors of (near-)LDraw source files? I stick with DAT for vanilla LDraw files. For other files files, I've been using: LDL - LDLite extensions (especially (...) (26 years ago, 29-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
2 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
