 | | Re: LDraw.org Standards Committee (LSC) Draft Proposal —Wayne Gramlich
|
| | | (...) All: While a ratification vote is fairly common for technical committee proposals, I don't think I've ever heard of a ratification vote that did not sustain a technical committee's recommendation. If a technical committee is doing the wrong (...) (22 years ago, 24-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: LDraw.org Standards Committee (LSC) Draft Proposal —Dan Boger
|
| | | | | On Thu, Apr 24, 2003 at 04:27:28AM +0000, Wayne Gramlich wrote: [snip very good points] (...) Wayne, this is a great idea, and I would support this kind of process. Dan (22 years ago, 24-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: LDraw.org Standards Committee (LSC) Draft Proposal —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | In lugnet.cad.dev, Wayne Gramlich wrote: [snip] (...) I think this sounds like an effective check on 'committees gone wild'. I would definitely support implementation of this process. Steve (22 years ago, 1-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: LDraw.org Standards Committee (LSC) Draft Proposal —Tim Courtney
|
| | | | (...) It's in the 0.99 draft, which realistically could be finalized at any time. www.zacktron.com/tem...SC099.html -Tim (22 years ago, 1-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | |
