 | | Re: Studs
|
|
(...) I guess I'm not a a standard user. :-) To me the objective should be to accurately represent the real world, not to copy the LEGO instructions. (...) My point of view also disagrees here. Studs of real transparent parts are hollow, at least in (...) (26 years ago, 29-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Complete list of metacommands?
|
|
-----Original message----- From: Steve Bliss <blisses@worldnet.att.net> To: lugnet.cad.dev@lugnet.com <lugnet.cad.dev@lugnet.com> Date: maandag 29 maart 1999 16:55 Subject: Re: Complete list of metacommands? (...) Steve, could you supply us with a (...) (26 years ago, 29-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Default extensions
|
|
Is anyone else bugged by the DAT extension? Does anyone else use other extensions for various flavors of (near-)LDraw source files? I stick with DAT for vanilla LDraw files. For other files files, I've been using: LDL - LDLite extensions (especially (...) (26 years ago, 29-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Star Wars Elements
|
|
(...) the (...) At least "Star Wars people" would not have to go looking for it. Someone using the part who is unfamiliar with Star Wars sets might never think to look for it there. That's the basic problem with theme-based nomenclature. It makes (...) (26 years ago, 29-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Java LDraw/LDLite
|
|
(...) (26 years ago, 29-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Star Wars Elements
|
|
(...) blade (...) to (...) I would disagree with you here, Steve, and agree with Jonathan on this one. For this purpose it should be next to the hilt so people don't have to go searching for it. Keep Building!! -Tim <>< (URL) timcourtne ICQ: (...) (26 years ago, 29-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Complete list of metacommands?
|
|
(...) These two comment meta-commands are not currently recognized by any programs, AFAIK. They are both part-file meta-commands, intended for use by part-search and part-catalog programs. CATEGORY specifies the part's category. I think all the (...) (26 years ago, 29-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Star Wars Elements
|
|
(...) No, it should be called 'Bar 4L'. That is the best description of what the piece *is*, rather than what it is currently being used *for*. Steve (26 years ago, 29-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: A solution to the part numbering problem? (Was: vote 9902)
|
|
We really need to have a program with a configurable INCLUDE path. So we can add to the default of: %ldraw%\p;%ldraw%\pa...;%current% Then we could go nuts with subdirectories. Well, sort of. Steve (...) (26 years ago, 29-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: parts DESPERATLY wanted (steve: please read)
|
|
(...) These parts won't be much use for a study, because I wrote a utility program to generate higher-resolution curve/ring sections. Steve (26 years ago, 29-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
