To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cad.devOpen lugnet.cad.dev in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / Development / 8575
8574  |  8576
Subject: 
Re: Backwards Compatibility (Was Calling all Meta-commands)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.cad.dev
Date: 
Sun, 23 Mar 2003 22:19:14 GMT
Viewed: 
4843 times
  
In lugnet.cad.dev, Orion Pobursky writes:
> In lugnet.cad.dev, Steve Bliss writes:
> <snip>
> > About the only thing ldraw.org could[1] do is to start an 'LDraw.org
> > Compatible' program, where various programs could label themselves as LDraw
> > compliant, if they follow the standards.[2]  But that sounds too
> > Mickey-Mouse to be worth doing, IMO.
> 
> <snip>
> 
> > 2) Such standard would need to include an outlet for developers to
> > do their own thing, without having to check with some committee
> > somewhere.
> 
> The point of setting an 'LDraw.org Compatible' format would be to set the
> framework of LDraw files, not to restrict what can be in LDraw files.  If a
> programmer wants to implement thier own extensions, that would OK and if
> said extensions gain widespread use then we could, with the developer's
> permission, fold them into to base spec.

Exactly.

-Tim



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Backwards Compatibility (Was Calling all Meta-commands)
 
In lugnet.cad.dev, Steve Bliss writes: <snip> (...) <snip> (...) The point of setting an 'LDraw.org Compatible' format would be to set the framework of LDraw files, not to restrict what can be in LDraw files. If a programmer wants to implement thier (...) (24 years ago, 22-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)

154 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR