CAD Development : 8528

CAD / Development / 8528

8527 | 8529

Subject:	Re: Backwards Compatibility (Was Calling all Meta-commands)
Newsgroups:	lugnet.cad.dev
Date:	Sat, 22 Mar 2003 00:26:37 GMT
Viewed:	4547 times

In lugnet.cad.dev, Tim Courtney wrote: > I've got some thoughts on the process to go about setting up the standards > body, but I'll wait and talk with Steve some on it, get more on the same > page with him, and post here. Sound reasonable? Does anyone else have any > suggestions on a good process to establish the body, and how to perpetuate it? Tim, I've been reading this thread, and you keep mentioning this 'Steve' person. 'Steve this' and 'Steve that'. I must have gone through 100 messages by now, and no 'Steve' has shown up. I'm beginning to suspect you are imagining this 'Steve' character. Or perhaps you created a fictitious personage for your own nefarious purposes. Hmmmm.... (looks suspiciously towards Mr. Courtney) hmmm.... ;) Steve

Message has 1 Reply:

		Re: Backwards Compatibility (Was Calling all Meta-commands)
(...) ROFL!!! :-) -Tim PS - Steve, while you posted quite a bit all at once, this isn't quite the "shock and awe" I was expecting. ;-) (24 years ago, 22-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)

Message is in Reply To:

		Re: Backwards Compatibility (Was Calling all Meta-commands)
(...) I understand the point, but yep - my line of thinking was what you just said, META isn't that common. (...) Ok. (...) Yeah. Well, the suggestion is something new - which ultimately should be considered by a standards body, and not decided upon (...) (24 years ago, 16-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)

154 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)

Entire Thread on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact