 | | Re: Self-Certification in parts tracker —Jacob Sparre Andersen
|
| | | (...) Yes. (...) I don't think they should be included (as a reviewer). (...) I think so. (...) :-) Jacob (22 years ago, 13-Jun-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Self-Certification in parts tracker —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | Here's a first attempt: (URL). This page excludes Certified! and Held files, and sorts by most-recent-action-date, oldest to newest. It does not take superfile-subfile relations into account. Take a look, and let me know what you think. One down (...) (22 years ago, 13-Jun-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Self-Certification in parts tracker —Carsten Schmitz
|
| | | | | Hello Steve, Looks very good... The easiest solution would be to add an 'Date of first submission' field in the part table. Because this field didn't exists so far the start value should be the date of the last action on a part. Then a parts thats (...) (22 years ago, 13-Jun-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Self-Certification in parts tracker —Ross Crawford
|
| | | | | (...) Looks good. I dont think the subfile issue is all that important, as I only ever review subfiles when required by a superfile I'm reviewing - the superfile will tell me if the subfiles need certifying anyway, and I can get to them easily from (...) (22 years ago, 14-Jun-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Self-Certification in parts tracker —Chris Dee
|
| | | | | (...) That looks great, Steve, thanks. I really think this will help to maintain author perspective, and help some reviewers to target the oldest files. Chris (22 years ago, 14-Jun-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Self-Certification in parts tracker —Jacob Sparre Andersen
|
| | | | (...) Looks good. Would it be difficult to limit the list to the first 20 or so entries? Jacob (22 years ago, 14-Jun-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Self-Certification in parts tracker —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | (...) Depends - do you want to be able to page to the *next* 20 or so entries? Without paging, it'd be very easy to implement. Steve (22 years ago, 14-Jun-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Self-Certification in parts tracker —Jacob Sparre Andersen
|
| | | | (...) I think I would, but just having the choice between only the first 20 entries (default) and all the entries (optional) would be helpful. Jacob (22 years ago, 18-Jun-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | |
