To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cad.devOpen lugnet.cad.dev in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / Development / 7322
7321  |  7323
Subject: 
Re: 30375cs0.dat, "MiniBot SW Battle Droid (complete)"
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.cad.dev
Date: 
Tue, 11 Jun 2002 19:23:42 GMT
Viewed: 
521 times
  
Because it's an assembled item, based on unpatterned/decorated parts.

Actually, since this file does *not* represent a part as delivered
by TLC, the title should be flagged (Shortcut), not (Complete)
(or (complete), as you put it).

[cue fx="light bulb" ]

Ahhh!  I see.  Sorry, my bad.

Part # 30375 isn't unique the the "Star Wars" theme,
it's used in the "Life on Mars" theme as well...

In that case, it might not be the best choice to use as
the base number for the shortcut files.

Well, since the torso has three different "Star Wars" patterns
(so far), for a total of four different battle droid "short cut"
assemblies for the "Star Wars" theme, I still think we should
use the torso as the base number...

How about these?

30375c00.dat  MiniBot SW Battle Droid (Shortcut)
30375c01.dat  MiniBot SW Battle Droid Commander (Shortcut)
30375c02.dat  MiniBot SW Battle Droid Security (Shortcut)
30375c03.dat  MiniBot SW Battle Droid Pilot (Shortcut)

This way, the last digit of the filename will correspond
to the (SW) pattern number, thus preserving the symmetry.
(Symmetry is important to me. ;-)

Thanks,
Franklin



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: 30375cs0.dat, "MiniBot SW Battle Droid (complete)"
 
(...) No big deal. It's a trivial thing, but if I can get everyone to use it the same way, I won't have to spend as much time twiddling part titles. :) Taking things a little out of the order you wrote them... (...) Sorry, I guess I wasn't totally (...) (22 years ago, 12-Jun-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: 30375cs0.dat, "MiniBot SW Battle Droid (complete)"
 
(...) Because it's an assembled item, based on unpatterned/decorated parts. Actually, since this file does *not* represent a part as delivered by TLC[1], the title should be flagged (Shortcut), not (Complete) (or (complete), as you put it). (...) In (...) (22 years ago, 11-Jun-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)

8 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR