 | | Re: Idea, using functions for some primitives. —Tim Courtney
|
| | | (...) By all means, a good discussion :-) (...) Here's how I see it. As a community we need to answer this question and act accordingly. What is the role of 'LDraw?' I see 'LDraw' as the file format and parts library, and its role is as a foundation (...) (23 years ago, 7-May-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: The Ldraw future (was: Idea, using functions for some primitives.) —Orion Pobursky
|
| | | | I completly agree with Tim, with one exception. The Lego parts coming out now are especially complex and involve patterns and colors that extend beyond the original LDraw colors set forth in James's program. I think a relaxation of the hard coded (...) (23 years ago, 7-May-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: The Ldraw future (was: Idea, using functions for some primitives.) —Franklin W. Cain
|
| | | | (...) I'd disagree with this. "Dithered colors" has been part of the "standard" LDraw package ever since I started playing with it. The only (minor/potential) problem with using dithered colors is that you have to stick the darned code for the (...) (23 years ago, 8-May-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | |
