 | | Re: Errors in certified parts (was [Parts Tracker] Daily News)
|
|
(...) Damien - I find your notes on parts *very* helpful, even if you don't want to vote "hold" on them, at least make a note so that such things won't go unnoticed :) I often miss a lot of the smaller details that you've picked up on. Thanks :) (23 years ago, 30-Nov-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Errors in certified parts (was [Parts Tracker] Daily News)
|
|
Hello, I would like to see a 'Comment' entry feature in the part tracker, so you can do comments and questions without voting or resetting the votes. That would be very important. I admit that i overlook details like this too. Another nice feature (...) (23 years ago, 30-Nov-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Errors in certified parts (was [Parts Tracker] Daily News)
|
|
(...) Yes! I agree that would be really nice! Also, is there a way for authors to get the email of revievers? If a reviewer leaves a comment the author doesn't understand, they need to be able to clarify it. (...) Many hands make light work! ROSCO (23 years ago, 30-Nov-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Errors in certified parts (was [Parts Tracker] Daily News)
|
|
(...) I believe that can be done if you're a reviewer by choosing the "novote" option instead of "certify" or "hold" (23 years ago, 30-Nov-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Errors in certified parts (was [Parts Tracker] Daily News)
|
|
Hello Jennifer, No.. First i thought that too but it overrides all votes , meaning resetting it. It's a 'great idea for a part, but this is so bad it is not ready for voting' vote. "Jennifer L. Boger" <jenn@peeron.com> schrieb im Newsbeitrag (...) (23 years ago, 30-Nov-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Errors in certified parts (was [Parts Tracker] Daily News)
|
|
(...) Yes, I agree. For now, you just have to remember to mark the vote the same as your prior vote. Ideally, there should be a comment area when a new file is submitted, and a separate post-a-comment function. (...) Nod. And we should be able to (...) (23 years ago, 30-Nov-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Errors in certified parts (was [Parts Tracker] Daily News)
|
|
(...) I'll second that! Steve (23 years ago, 30-Nov-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Contacting Reviewers (was: Errors in certified parts (was [Parts Tracker] Daily News))
|
|
(...) Not at this time. It's been brought up that perhaps the list of reviewers should be made public (although I'm not so sure about publishing their email addresses). Would everyone agree that a list of the names of reviewers should be put up on (...) (23 years ago, 30-Nov-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Contacting Reviewers (was: Errors in certified parts (was [Parts Tracker] Daily News))
|
|
(...) I personally don't mind, but I wouldn't want to speak for anyone else. (23 years ago, 30-Nov-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Errors in certified parts (was [Parts Tracker] Daily News)
|
|
(...) I agree - I'd rather fix the parts I've submitted - so dont be afraid of pointing out small errors. Chris (23 years ago, 30-Nov-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Contacting Reviewers (was: Errors in certified parts (was [Parts Tracker] Daily News))
|
|
(...) One way to get around the publishing emails problem is to provide a link against each vote / comment, which brings up a screen with a message field. When you submit the form, it sends email to the chosen reviewer, with subject "re: LDraw parts (...) (23 years ago, 30-Nov-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Contacting Reviewers (was: Errors in certified parts (was [Parts Tracker] Daily News))
|
|
(...) I would not agree to it, I get too much junk mail as it is. :) (...) I was think along this line as well. If the tracker keeps "track" of who submitted the part file, it could email the comments directly to the submitter. - or - A check box (...) (23 years ago, 1-Dec-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
