 | | Re: Part: Excavator arm / bucket (small)
|
|
(...) With all the various buckets and related accessories released by LEGO, I think this description is a bit vague. Which sets feature the parts you are looking for? (...) Irregularly shaped parts like excavator buckets are very difficult to model (...) (23 years ago, 5-Oct-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Part: Excavator arm / bucket (small)
|
|
Does anyone have a DAT for the small digger/excavator arm and bucket? I'm surprised to find this old favourite missing when other 'upstarts' (e.g. Mindstorms) are all there! Jason J Railton (23 years ago, 5-Oct-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Parts Tracker News
|
|
(...) Great news Steve - thanks for all the work you've put into this. I plan to review the parts which I have IRL (and didn't author myself) this weekend. Or can I "certify" my own parts, also? Chris (23 years ago, 5-Oct-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Parts Tracker News
|
|
(...) Way cool! Just one question, is this a static page updated periodically? Just wondering 'cos (not wanting to blow my own horn) my x121 Air Horn shows up with a Y on the standard list, but no Y votes on the certification status list. (...) (...) (23 years ago, 5-Oct-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Parts Tracker News
|
|
"Steve Bliss" <steve.bliss@home.com> wrote in message news:GKpB3L.Hus@lugnet.com... (...) for (...) list, (...) Comments (...) Nifty! (...) library (...) yet; (...) Coolness. Thanks a ton, Steve! Keep it up :-) -Tim LDraw.org (23 years ago, 4-Oct-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Parts Tracker News
|
|
Just a few quick items. Some good news, some not-as-good news. First, there's a new report-page, which shows the 'certification status' for each part. The parts that are ready for release are at the top of the list, the rest are below. And the most (...) (23 years ago, 4-Oct-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Future extension of dat files?
|
|
(...) I get this: C:\>assoc .ldr .ldr=l3.dat C:\>assoc .dat .dat=L3.dat But I was mucking with assoc yesterday, so don't assume this is the normal result of the registry mucking I did before then. (...) Probably LDraw.Document would be good, having (...) (23 years ago, 2-Oct-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Codes for New Colors (was: Sand Red Bricks)
|
|
Steve: (...) That's also my intention with them. Similarly are the POV-Ray colour codes intended to be the closest match for rendering the colours and transparancies in POV-Ray. Play well, Jacob -- (URL) (23 years ago, 2-Oct-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Future extension of dat files?
|
|
(...) I don't suppose you could humor me and type: assoc .ldr at a command prompt and tell me what you get. Since we seem to be standardizing on the .ldr extension and the application/x-ldraw, it might be nice to standardize the rest of the junk (...) (23 years ago, 1-Oct-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Codes for New Colors (was: Sand Red Bricks)
|
|
(...) I always thought the RGBs in the FAQ were supposed to be approximations of the 'real colors'. LDraw's palette is a poor match for real LEGO, and I'd hate to be stuck with it's selections. Although there were some values that we didn't have any (...) (23 years ago, 2-Oct-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
