 | | Re: patents —Steve Bliss
|
| | | (...) 1) TLG knows about LDraw. 2) One or more LEGO employees read this newsgroup/mailing list. Steve (26 years ago, 9-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: patents —Jeremy H. Sproat
|
| | | | | (...) Hmmm. Okay, I see two options: <EXCITED_JOHN_CLEESE_VOICE> Right then. 1. We don't mention LDraw by name at all any more. To keep a low profile, we could set up a secret project and use the code name "Henrietta" - e.g. "The April 1999 parts (...) (26 years ago, 9-Mar-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: patents —Jeff Boen
|
| | | | | | | (...) <EXCITED *SNIP!*> (...) sproat, you RULE! :P J (26 years ago, 9-Mar-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: patents —Terry Keller
|
| | | | | | | | (...) Yeah, rules the toads in the short forest. Methinks sometimes my friend Jeremy doth go mental. :-) -- Terry K -- (26 years ago, 9-Mar-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: patents —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | | | | | (...) It's those throwbot parts. They're sending him over the edge. Steve (26 years ago, 9-Mar-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: patents —Fred Carcanague III
|
| | | | | | | | | John Cleese is good, as long as we don't get into the Lumberjack song.... -- Everything else is just a toy... (URL) (26 years ago, 9-Mar-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | Re: patents —Richard Dee
|
| | | | | | | | | | On Tue, 9 Mar 1999 15:56:01 GMT, Fred Carcanague III uttered the following profundities... (...) John Cleese did not sing The Lumberjack Song, that was Michael Palin. (26 years ago, 11-Mar-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: patents —Richard Dee
|
| | | | | | | | | | On Thu, 11 Mar 1999 23:09:35 GMT, Richard Dee uttered the following profundities... (...) I'm a lego nut and I'm okay. I sleep all night and I build all day I wish I was a forest wench, just like..... :o) (26 years ago, 20-Mar-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: patents —Jeremy H. Sproat
|
| | | | | | | | (...) Methinks legoverse doth protest too much. :-P (1) BTW, I prefer the term "para-mental". It keeps me out of the loony bin. (...) Or are they [INSERT_PUN_HERE]ing me over the edge...? >:-) Cheers, - jsproat 1. Good quote. That's my favorite line (...) (26 years ago, 9-Mar-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: patents —Jasper Janssen
|
| | | | | | (...) While the HitchHiker's guide is definitely literary by my standards, I'm not due if Back to the Future qualifies. Say, don't you have any more _difficult_ R's to S? Jasper (26 years ago, 11-Mar-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: patents —Jeremy H. Sproat
|
| | | | | | (...) Au contrare, mon frere. While it certainly has a lot of undesirable attributes -- it was directed with teen-agers in mind, it starred Mr. Fox, it had music by Huey Lewis, it introduced new slang terms into everyday lingo, etc. -- the movie (...) (26 years ago, 11-Mar-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: patents —Jasper Janssen
|
| | | | | | (...) I wouldn't call BD or GnR literature either. By any stretch of the imagination. Worthy of study? possibly. But literature? Not in my definition. And why would you want to watch it _again_ in class? I & III, the good ones, are on every 4-6 (...) (26 years ago, 12-Mar-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: patents —Terry Keller
|
| | | | (...) I say go forth blindly. Just do it. If they get upset, then we worry about it. I would be more concerned if we were talking about Star TREK elements, since Paramount is well known for trying to squash anything they can't profit from. -- Terry (...) (26 years ago, 9-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | |
