 | | Re: 'Article from Tommorow' < Warning Speculative!!>
|
|
(...) Yeah, I still prefer using the original version of LDraw. MLCad uses too many of my system resources. I wish someone would update LDraw!!! Mike (24 years ago, 27-Jan-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.trains, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Diablo-style RPG?
|
|
Hey, Anyone interested in creating a Diablo-style RPG using LDraw? I sorta know how to do it using the freeware Dink Smallwood engine. It wouldn't be too hard, just time-consuming. Plus, to all you long-term, quasi-professional LDraw & Lugnet (...) (24 years ago, 27-Jan-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: 'Article from Tommorow' < Warning Speculative!!>
|
|
<Warning this article is a speculative post designed to encourage disscusssion on new ideas (and hopefully suggest some Ideas to TLC/TLG.) > Hold the presses!! Some new info just come through on the WAP service from Lego.com... (...) And thats the (...) (24 years ago, 19-Jan-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.trains, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw.org Reference Organization Questions
|
|
(...) For right now, keep the layout basically how it is. I'd add posting dates for each of the items, and put the newest items at the top. If an item gets significantly updated, move it to the top. You might also add icons (either textual or (...) (24 years ago, 18-Jan-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: LCAD 02?- Comments wanted
|
|
"Farlie A" <alex_farlie@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:G7BByH.9I8@lugnet.com... (...) suggested. (...) I believe that though you have some good suggestions, the time and energy required to develop a new format is almost a waste of time given the (...) (24 years ago, 17-Jan-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
