  |    | Re: 4.5 Volt straight track (p/n 3228), different versions ?
  |  
  | 
 "Larry Pieniazek" <lpieniazek@mercator.com> wrote in message news:G6K5vr.IFK@lugnet.com... (...) posting (...) Good point. Follow-up posts don't bother me as much, since I use a newsreader, but they would muddy the .dat waters for web browsers. We (...)   (25 years ago, 3-Jan-01, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.admin.general)   
   | 
 |   | 
  |    | Re: POV difference in LDraw?
  |  
  | 
(...) There's been quite a bit written about the transformation matrix, in the LDraw FAQ and on this newsgroup. Can you be more specific about the problem you're having? Steve    (25 years ago, 3-Jan-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)   
   | 
 |   | 
  |    | Re: 4.5 Volt straight track (p/n 3228), different versions ?
  |  
  | 
(...) Thanks for the reminder... I *always* forget that. (...) Which you forgot to do! <zing> :-) ++Lar    (25 years ago, 2-Jan-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad.dev)   
   | 
 |   | 
  |    | Re: Line Thickness  and Antialiasing in LdGLite 0.7.3
  |  
  | 
Very cool! I noticed two things, which could be considered problems. One is straight-forward, the other is not so. The first thing is that using the -ms commandline option doesn't save any images if there are no 0 STEP commands in the file. I was (...)   (25 years ago, 2-Jan-01, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev)   
   | 
 |   | 
  |    | Re: Line Thickness  and Antialiasing in LdGLite 0.7.3
  |  
  | 
(...) I understand the problems related to this. It is not a major issue with me, as I will use LdGLite (is the the correct capitalization?) mostly for explorative viewing of a complete model, not for step-by-step viewing. It may be a problem when (...)   (25 years ago, 2-Jan-01, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev)   
   |