Subject:
|
Sub Models
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Mon, 13 Nov 2000 15:06:19 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
363 times
|
| |
|
|
Is it possible to have too many sub models? I am working on 6989, and I
currently have about 12 sub-models, 1 for each of most of the moving parts.
I chose to do this so the model could be shown in different configurations.
Its not particularly for the OMR or anything, but I am asking just to get an
idea what people like.
--D M Garcia
http://www.geocities.com/dmglego/
"An expert built the Titanic, an amateur built the Ark"
|
|
Message has 3 Replies:
 | | Re: Sub Models
|
| Well, when I am looking at other people's models, I tend to store them in their own separate directory whenever they have ANY submodels, so having more doesn't bother me much. One thing that I do find to be annoying is when there are lots of (...) (24 years ago, 14-Nov-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | Re: Sub Models
|
| (...) Are you asking from an asthetics POV, or do you mean technically? Technically, there's no hard limit on the number of sub-models. I've got one MPD that has 87 files, and it draws fine as either a single MPD file, or as a collection of (...) (24 years ago, 14-Nov-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | Re: Sub Models
|
| I did the MCM, and posted it here: (URL) you would like the version with subfiles, just LMK -John Van "D M Garcia" <dmglego@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:G3yxyn.1F4@lugnet.com... (...) and I (...) parts. (...) configurations. (...) get an (...) (24 years ago, 14-Nov-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
5 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
