 | | Re: Voting Open for LCAD Parts Update 2000-01 —Fredrik Glöckner
|
| | | (...) If you are interested to see how I did it, you can view the DAT file for the model at: (URL) for the keyword "Bezier" to find the first occurence of the bent flexible axle. I used the following names for the various parts of the axle: (...) (24 years ago, 13-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Voting Open for LCAD Parts Update 2000-01 —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | | (...) No hassle felt on my end--I feel stupid that I went to all the work of figuring out the angles, and then didn't document them. (...) Good point. We should definitely try harder to document part-usage. (...) Now that you mention the complete (...) (24 years ago, 13-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Voting Open for LCAD Parts Update 2000-01 —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | (...) I could redo the part, slicing it into sections that are 4LDU long. To properly package, this, each distinct/unique section should be made into a subpart file, and the main part files would be a list of these subparts. Taking this approach, (...) (24 years ago, 13-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Voting Open for LCAD Parts Update 2000-01 —Fredrik Glöckner
|
| | | | (...) It would probably be good enough to keep the "tip" in one, non-bendable part. Sure, I can think of situations where one would put only the outer part of the tip into something, causing the other part to bend. But that would probably be quite (...) (24 years ago, 14-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Voting Open for LCAD Parts Update 2000-01 —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | I posted an updated TFA11 to (URL). Geez, I wish I could follow hyperlinks within my newsreader. There are some mistakes in the part, but the posting was mostly to look at how the main file was constructed, not the subfile details. (...) OK, I made (...) (24 years ago, 14-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Voting Open for LCAD Parts Update 2000-01 —Fredrik Glöckner
|
| | | | (...) I think there are a few mistakes in that file. I posted a corrected version which looks good on my system. (...) Yeah, that's a good point. You'll do whatever you want on the issue of splitting the central part of the hose or not, I don't care (...) (24 years ago, 15-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | |
