 | | Re: Comments on parts up for vote- Pt 1 —Chris Dee
|
| | | (...) I'll fix the singular matrices - this was authored before L3Lab was publicly available. It was also done in the expectation that the matching door-frame would be sent in for the voting (don't remember who by). Maybe I'll put that on my work (...) (24 years ago, 12-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Comments on parts up for vote- Pt 1 —Chris Dee
|
| | | | | (...) on (...) In fact is is worse than just singular matrices - there is an error in these lines which means the intersects between the bars are not be drawn as lines. Fixed and sent to Steve. Chris (24 years ago, 13-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Comments on parts up for vote- Pt 1 —Lars C. Hassing
|
| | | | Chris Dee wrote... (...) "L3P -check" has always been able to spot singular matrices, simply because POV cannot handle them. L3Lab uses the same file parser as L3P (which BTW is public available in ldglite). However, L3Lab could easily render edge (...) (24 years ago, 18-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Comments on parts up for vote- Pt 1 —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | (...) No, it's a good thing to have a program to identify these things. Even though edges-only primitives can't be BFC'ed, I'm guessing there could be other advantages to avoiding singular matrices, and few disadvantages. Steve (24 years ago, 19-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | |
