 | | Comments on parts up for vote- Pt 1
|
|
I made it half way through the parts when MSOE crashed and lost my comments, so I'll do this one in rounds. 6199.dat - Belville Swing: missing edgelines where the uprights meet the crossbar. Since the bars are equal diameter, this can easily be (...) (25 years ago, 11-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Comments on parts up for vote- Pt 1
|
|
(...) This part, like other "decorated" parts, has a subfile (for whenever I feel confident enough to tackle a *printed* 6x4 flag, like the Jolly Roger). If the DAT file is *just* the DAT file (for the undecorated/basic form), and not a MPD file (...) (25 years ago, 11-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Comments on parts up for vote- Pt 1
|
|
Franklin W. Cain <fwcain@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:FsvF0L.F2I@lugnet.com... (...) No, I mean empty as in no lines of text in the file. This is downloading the individual .dat from the voting page. I can't get the zip file to download, (...) (25 years ago, 11-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Comments on parts up for vote- Pt 1
|
|
(...) Erk. QA failure. Should be an MPD with the file and the subfile, but it appears to be an empty DAT. I'll fix this up tonight. Steve (25 years ago, 11-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Comments on parts up for vote- Pt 1
|
|
(...) OK, this is fixed now. Steve (25 years ago, 12-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Comments on parts up for vote- Pt 1
|
|
(...) I'll fix the singular matrices - this was authored before L3Lab was publicly available. It was also done in the expectation that the matching door-frame would be sent in for the voting (don't remember who by). Maybe I'll put that on my work (...) (25 years ago, 12-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Comments on parts up for vote- Pt 1
|
|
(...) My comments (that have not already been mentioned) ... 2494p01.dat Does this exist as a printed part, or is this really a sticker? 2552.dat The edge lines on the underside do not seem to line up with the boundaries of the quads. 30044.dat (...) (25 years ago, 12-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Comments on parts up for vote- Pt 1
|
|
(...) on (...) In fact is is worse than just singular matrices - there is an error in these lines which means the intersects between the bars are not be drawn as lines. Fixed and sent to Steve. Chris (25 years ago, 13-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Comments on parts up for vote- Pt 1
|
|
Chris Dee <chris_w_dee@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:Fsx353.67B@lugnet.com... (...) This same criticism applies to: 4478p01.dat - Baseplate 32 x 32 With Driveway and Grey Pattern -John Van (25 years ago, 14-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Comments on parts up for vote- Pt 1
|
|
Chris Dee wrote... (...) "L3P -check" has always been able to spot singular matrices, simply because POV cannot handle them. L3Lab uses the same file parser as L3P (which BTW is public available in ldglite). However, L3Lab could easily render edge (...) (25 years ago, 18-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Comments on parts up for vote- Pt 1
|
|
(...) No, it's a good thing to have a program to identify these things. Even though edges-only primitives can't be BFC'ed, I'm guessing there could be other advantages to avoiding singular matrices, and few disadvantages. Steve (25 years ago, 19-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
