Subject:
|
Time for BFC overhaul?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Wed, 29 Mar 2000 16:06:56 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1365 times
|
| |
![Post a public reply to this message](/news/icon-reply.gif) | |
Now that MLCad is supporting BFC, should we begin overhauling the parts
database to take advantage of this? I'd be interested in working on this for
a while.
What is the status of the meta-command discussion? How close are we to
closure?
-John Van
|
|
Message has 1 Reply: ![](/news/x.gif) | | Re: Time for BFC overhaul?
|
| (...) Oh, good! Fresh blood. :) I've uploaded a BFC-test file with the part files for a few bricks, and the primitives needed to support them. Anyone who wants to play with these files can get them from (URL). My suggestion: make a second (...) (24 years ago, 30-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
5 Messages in This Thread: ![You are here](/news/here.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Time for BFC overhaul? -Steve Bliss (30-Mar-00 to lugnet.cad.dev)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Time for BFC overhaul? -Rui Manuel Silva Martins (30-Mar-00 to lugnet.cad.dev)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Time for BFC overhaul? -Steve Bliss (30-Mar-00 to lugnet.cad.dev)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Time for BFC overhaul? -Rui Manuel Silva Martins (2-Apr-00 to lugnet.cad.dev)](/news/x.gif)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|