 | | Re: [3068 with groove] (was:DAT voting page up) —Roy Earls
|
| | | Todd Lehman wrote in message ... (...) Really? Another version change. I'm thinking we need to look a little closer for a list of these version changes over the ages. How about it? Anyone else out there have more examples in this line. Todd, as an (...) (26 years ago, 27-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: [3068 with groove] (was:DAT voting page up) —Paul Gyugyi
|
| | | | | My favorite part change is the 1x2 plate with laser prongs. The height of the prongs in relation to the 1x2 plate has changed, and the two versions do not line up. -gyug (...) (26 years ago, 2-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: [3068 with groove] (was:DAT voting page up) —Roy Earls
|
| | | | | | Paul Gyugyi wrote in message <36DB9CF5.6A730D96@g...yi.com>... (...) Now here is a good example of how TLG/LDraw part numbers come in handy. Paul, I'm unsure as to what part is a 1x2 plate with laser prongs. Has it been modeled in LDraw? If not, (...) (26 years ago, 2-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: [3068 with groove] (was:DAT voting page up) —Fredrik Glöckner
|
| | | | | | | (...) 3945.DAT Plate 1 x 2 with Handles (URL) don't know about this part nowadays, but I remember back in the days of classic space that this part came in _many_ versions. At least I can remember three different. Some has 2 unit long handles with (...) (26 years ago, 2-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: [3068 with groove] (was:DAT voting page up) —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | | | | (...) Part #3945, the 1x2 plate with two side handles. Steve (26 years ago, 2-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: [3068 with groove] (was:DAT voting page up) —Selçuk Göre
|
| | | | | | Earls HouseHold wrote in message ... (...) Those numbers are handy, because there is no standardized name scheme. And in most common part dictionary, (I mean ldraw part name library) this part is named as " ....with handles." Selçuk (...) (26 years ago, 4-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: [3068 with groove] (was:DAT voting page up) —Roy Earls
|
| | | | Earls HouseHold wrote in message ... (...) I've always thought it was pretty stupid to reply to your own post. So, call me stupid. Here the list of changed parts I've been able to come with. It is in no way complete or do I say it is correct. Any (...) (26 years ago, 2-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: [3068 with groove] (was:DAT voting page up) —Bram Lambrecht
|
| | | | (...) Yes. (...) I don't think so. (...) Yes. (...) Here's another: 3062 brick 1 x 1 round 3 versions- no lip at the bottom, closed stud, and open stud. --Bram Bram Lambrecht / o o \ BramL@juno.com ---...---oooo-----(_...o---...--- WWW: (URL) (26 years ago, 3-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: [3068 with groove] (was:DAT voting page up) —Selçuk Göre
|
| | | | Bram Lambrecht wrote in message <19990302.220734.509...no.com>... (...) Don't go that far, even regular rectangular bricks has several different versions. My oldest ones has slits through under side tubes...And there are the other ones without (...) (26 years ago, 4-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: [3068 with groove] (was:DAT voting page up) —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | (...) The changes in the 1x1 cylinder brick are functional -- with the bottom lip, the cylinder will fit between 4 studs, and with the hole-y stud, you can put an antenna rod through the cylinder. Another functional (but less important) varied (...) (26 years ago, 4-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | |
