 | | Re: Part Numbering Crisis in LDraw —Patrick Sayre-Little
|
| | | At the risk of being flamed into lurk mode, I'm going to ask the following: Why do we need the official TLG part numbers? Why not just use a numbering system that makes sense? (26 years ago, 27-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Part Numbering Crisis in LDraw —John VanZwieten
|
| | | | (...) Why (...) If I'm converting a physical model to Ldraw, its nice to be able to look at part, find its molded number, then add that number to my model. This of course only works for parts with numbers on them. This also argues for somehow (...) (26 years ago, 27-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Part Numbering Crisis in LDraw —Patrick Sayre-Little
|
| | | | | (...) So _that's_ how you do it. I knew there had to be a better way. :) (...) Thanks, that makes sense to me. (26 years ago, 27-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Part Numbering Crisis in LDraw —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | (...) You've just hit on my pet peeve with the approach of using the most official numbers for LDraw parts -- often, the most official number is *not* the one you find stamped on the part. This will be true if: - You are looking at a multi-part (...) (26 years ago, 1-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | |
