|
|
 | | Re: New LDraw version ?
|
| (...) Now those are true words! We have almost as many renderers as users! :-) No harm meant, though. Personally, I prefer LEdit to compose (sub) models, L3Lab to do explorative viewing and LDLITE to do final rendering of models. If there is ever a (...) (25 years ago, 13-Feb-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | | | Re: New LDraw version ?
|
| Rene Virsik: (...) I assume that you want to know if there will be released a new version of LDraw sometime. The answer to that question is (technically speaking) almost definitely "no". I think we should avoid using the name "LDraw II" until we can (...) (25 years ago, 13-Feb-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | | | New LDraw version ?
|
| Heya. Sorry if this was mentioned before but will it be not realized a new version of LDraw or LDraw II. ? Thanx. Rene (25 years ago, 13-Feb-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | | | Re: Suggestion for interprocess communication
|
| (...) It's not Windows standard? I think it would be neat if I, for example, could use Notepad as a source and destination. (25 years ago, 13-Feb-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | | | Re: How is parts.lst created / solving VEC problem
|
| Steve, You've cleared up a lot for me, and hopefully for others, too. I guess THIS is the write-up :) James (...) outdated. (...) (25 years ago, 12-Feb-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
|
