 | | Re: DAT voting page up —Bram Lambrecht
|
| | | (...) The curved edges are an essential part of the piece, especially when viewed in LDLite or POV-Ray. Not modeling them would be like leaving the curved edges off of the Windscreens - the edges are a highly recogizable feature of the part. --Bram (...) (26 years ago, 26-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: DAT voting page up —Jonathan Wilson
|
| | | | (...) the canyon raised baseplate does not have the rounded edges. (26 years ago, 26-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: DAT voting page up —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | (...) Then it's broken too. :) --Todd (26 years ago, 27-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: DAT voting page up —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | (...) True, but it's also a precedent. I'd rather have the bottom surface than curved edges. I'd consider a part with all surfaces more accurate than a part with closely-modeled upper surfaces, but the underside completely missing. Maybe I'm just (...) (26 years ago, 1-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | |
