 | | Re: Looking for a part
|
| (...) guess it would be 'Bracket 1x2 - 4x4 Round' or something. I remember John VanZwieten being involved in a discussion of the exact angle of this part[1], and I thought it was posted and/or submitted, but now I can't find it. (...) copy. (...) of (...) (25 years ago, 10-Feb-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | | | Re: Looking for a part
|
| (...) 9- (...) Oops! I forgot, the part number I have is 30209(blue) Paul (25 years ago, 10-Feb-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | | | Re: Looking for a part
|
| (...) version (...) Ok, Ok, It's me again... I have found this part on another set #6837 "Cosmic Creeper". (URL) this set the part is at a square 90 degrees. No Kidding, I even had my wife compare this part to the one in the #6903 "Bug Blaster" set. (...) (25 years ago, 10-Feb-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | | | Re: Looking for a part
|
| (...) I wrote 9 degrees from memory. I couldn't locate the previous discussion. (...) least three Spaceport sets, and the Mos Espa Podrace set. (...) Hmm. I wonder what caused the variation. A few ideas: 1. Differences between the molds in the (...) (25 years ago, 10-Feb-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | | | Re: Looking for a part
|
| (...) as (...) wife (...) Mishandling would seem to unlikely. With no visible sign of distortion they appear to have been molded that way. Do you want me to send you one of each? (...) I agree that we would should draw it at 90deg., with maybe a (...) (25 years ago, 11-Feb-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | | | Re: Looking for a part
|
| (...) Not really. John Van Zwieten had made a partial-sphere primitive, which *might* be useful for this part. What do you think, John? (...) For now, all my LDraw-related time is devoted to preparing the next parts update. Steve (25 years ago, 11-Feb-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
