 | | Re: Subgroup for Revamp? —Tim Courtney
| | | | (...) Probably good, so we can weed out general ldraw discussion from site discussion. I see the Re: proposal.. thread has been chopped up into the set/piece discussion too..that would help on that as well. lugnet.cad.dev.site? Keep Building!! -Tim (...) (25 years ago, 10-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Subgroup for Revamp? —Todd Lehman
| | | | | | (...) I like the idea of a short-term newsgrouping experiment, but since the discussions would be centered around a permanently evolving resource, maybe the experiment would work better with a transient resource, project, or event instead. In other (...) (25 years ago, 10-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Subgroup for Revamp? —Tim Courtney
| | | | | (...) Short term, set up a group for discussion. Long term -- integrate the sites together in crucial areas, like the setup of tlg models newsgroups and then automatically generating dat files that correspond with the posts.. similar to online (...) (25 years ago, 10-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | | | | |
