CAD Development : 3735


CAD / Development / 3735	3734 \| 3736

Subject:	Re: OMR Filenaming Standard Change?
Newsgroups:	lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.cad.dev
Date:	Mon, 24 Jan 2000 00:58:19 GMT
Viewed:	70 times

Ryan wrote: > One thing that I just thought of as I was making a set is that we also ought to > have a submodel for hoses, just like we do for minifigs, that way all those > hose sections are in their own file. We could name it hose1.dat, hose2.dat, > etc. > I think that this is a good idea because if someone's viewing a model in > Ledit, they aren't going to want to page down through all those extra line that > could be stored in another file. > > Ryan Yes. All hoses and such like should be in a submodel. -- Jonathan Wilson wilsonj@xoommail.com http://members.xoom.com/wilsonj/

Message is in Reply To:

		Re: OMR Filenaming Standard Change?
One thing that I just thought of as I was making a set is that we also ought to have a submodel for hoses, just like we do for minifigs, that way all those hose sections are in their own file. We could name it hose1.dat, hose2.dat, etc. I think that (...) (25 years ago, 23-Jan-00, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.cad.dev)

4 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact

Custom Search