 | | 4x4x3 cone! (was: Re: Reference Site Inconsistencies) —Todd Lehman
|
| | | (...) Whoa! Wow! (URL) learn somethin' new about LEGO every day! :) --Todd p.s. Question: Was it really 3 standard bricks tall (most likely) or perchance was it just shy or just over 3 tall? Anyone got one for real? (25 years ago, 6-Jan-00, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.build)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: 4x4x3 cone! (was: Re: Reference Site Inconsistencies) —Chris Ernest Hall
|
| | | | | (...) I do, but it's back at my mom's house in the SF Bay Area, and I'm here in sunny Cambridge, MA. If memory serves, it is indeed three bricks tall. It's a cool piece, and I'm surprised TLC has never brought it back, since they seem to have a (...) (25 years ago, 6-Jan-00, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.build)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: 4x4x3 cone! (was: Re: Reference Site Inconsistencies) —Frank Buiting
|
| | | | | (...) Yup I've just checked it (I have two of the cones from the 725 freight train) (URL) the cone is three bricks tall, the size 4x4x3 is correct. -Frank (25 years ago, 6-Jan-00, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.build)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: 4x4x3 cone! (was: Re: Reference Site Inconsistencies) —Chris Ernest Hall
|
| | | | | | (...) That's the set I got mine from as well. The rocketbase set was perhaps my most desired set during my early childhood that I didn't end up getting. - chris (25 years ago, 6-Jan-00, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.build)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: 4x4x3 cone! (was: Re: Reference Site Inconsistencies) —Chris Dee
|
| | | | (...) Yes it really is - and yes I have two in white. Chris (25 years ago, 6-Jan-00, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.build)
|
| | | | |
