 | | Re: General Comments to MLCad
|
|
(...) It would be better (IMO) to format non-LDraw information as LDraw-style meta-commands, and keep everything in the DAT format. That gives the file the widest transportability between programs. Steve (25 years ago, 20-Dec-99, to lugnet.cad.mlcad, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: The updated PARTS.LST online?
|
|
(...) It is? Well, duh. Thanks for the info. Anyway, I still think that a browsable parts.lst could be a good idea. Sometimes I have the need to look up a part name or number when I'm not on a system with LDraw on it, and I think perhaps others may (...) (25 years ago, 20-Dec-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: The updated PARTS.LST online?
|
|
(...) An updated parts.lst is included in every parts update. Steve (25 years ago, 20-Dec-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: The updated PARTS.LST online?
|
|
(...) Sounds like a good idea. Would /download/updates/ be appropriate for this? And does anyone have a non-butchered current parts.lst (unlike mine) they'd send for this? I'll get it up at least by Thursday, when I update the MOTM voting. -Tim (...) (25 years ago, 20-Dec-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | The updated PARTS.LST online?
|
|
I think it would be a good idea to make the updated PARTS.LST file be available online as new releases are made. I know that the PARTS.LST file should be remade on the local system as the new parts are installed, but I still think it would be nice (...) (25 years ago, 20-Dec-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
