CAD Development : 2696


CAD / Development / 2696	2695 \| 2697

Subject:	Re: CFV: Jonathan Wilson's posting privileges on LUGNET
Newsgroups:	lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.starwars
Date:	Tue, 17 Aug 1999 02:17:20 GMT
Viewed:	66 times

Eric Kingsley wrote: > In lugnet.admin.general, Jonathan Wilson writes: > > > http://www.lugnet.com/off-topic/geek/?n=377 > > > > I am baffeled as to how that message got on .geek. > > I only sent it to tore himself (at least acording to the message in my sent > mail folder I did) > > And that makes it OK? It was still extremely rude whether you sent it to Tore > or posted it. It showed no respect for Tore at all. > > Eric > > Remove ".nospam" when replying by E-mail. > > The New England LEGO Users Group > http://www.nelug.org/ Tore did not send me a rude reply. He actually took the time to answer my questions, therefore he does not consider the post rude and since it was meant only for his eyes that means that the opinions of the rest of the group as to the rudeness of the post do not matter as the group should never have seen it in the first place.

Message has 3 Replies:

		Re: CFV: Jonathan Wilson's posting privileges on LUGNET
(...) Tore (...) Agreed to all of Eric's above points. (...) Going solely by what Tore posted, no, he was not rude. Mercy triumphs over justice (but each has its place), so let's take these following points one at a time, not as a convoluted lump, (...) (25 years ago, 17-Aug-99, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.starwars)

		Re: CFV: Jonathan Wilson's posting privileges on LUGNET
(...) According to the NNTP headers in the message, it was posted by you to lugnet.off-topic.geek on Tuesday, August 3, 1999 at 11:16:38 GMT, from studun26.murdoch.edu.au, using Netscape 4.03 for Win95. Still baffled? (...) Apparently you posted it (...) (25 years ago, 17-Aug-99, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.starwars)

		Re: CFV: Jonathan Wilson's posting privileges on LUGNET
(...) Tore (...) Jonathan I just don't think you "get it". I have been giving this vote alot of thought and was inclined to give you the benefit of the doubt and vote for probation and take a "wait and see" approach. Now I am not so sure. When you (...) (25 years ago, 17-Aug-99, to lugnet.admin.general)

Message is in Reply To:

		Re: CFV: Jonathan Wilson's posting privileges on LUGNET
(...) mail folder I did) And that makes it OK? It was still extremely rude whether you sent it to Tore or posted it. It showed no respect for Tore at all. Eric Remove ".nospam" when replying by E-mail. The New England LEGO Users Group (URL) (25 years ago, 17-Aug-99, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.starwars)

101 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)

Entire Thread on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact

Custom Search