Subject:
|
Re: i admit i was wrong
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Fri, 13 Aug 1999 13:56:02 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
897 times
|
| |
|
|
Steve Bliss writes:
> JW wrote:
> > and the other baseplates do not have the edges so I will assume that
> > they are not needed.
>
> Don't assume: remember. This was discussed before. Since the other
> raised baseplate in the LDraw library doesn't use curved edges, you • don't
> *have* to do them in your part. It would improve the quality of the • part[2],
> but it isn't required.
>
> 2- Actually, it's debatable whether curved edges would improve the
> part. It's possible the part wouldn't look as good in LDraw, because of • the
> lack of edge-lines.
Type 5 lines would make up for the lack of edge lines on curved edges,
wouldn't they? (But I won't pretend that I know anything about using
type 5 lines :/ ) Also, as more and more people raytrace their models, I
think LDrawn parts should attempt to recreate actual parts as closely as
possible. That's also a good argument for Lars and Lutz to join forces.
I think that L2P and L3P parts would mix fairly well, which would provide
the quality of the LGEO library where possible and fill in L3P parts
created on the fly where no LGEO part existed.
Lutz, Lars: have you contacted each other about such a possibility?
--Bram
Bram Lambrecht / o o \ BramL@juno.com
-------------------oooo-----(_)-----oooo-------------------
WWW: http://www.chuh.org/Students/Bram-Lambrecht/
-----------------------------------------------------------
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: i admit i was wrong
|
| Bram Lambrecht <braml@juno.com> wrote in message news:19990813.073557...uno.com... (...) The type 5 lines only show up at the outer edges. There still would be no edgeline extending the length of the edge between the top and side faces, simply (...) (25 years ago, 13-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: i admit i was wrong
|
| (...) How could you *not* know? People have been blasting you about it for weeks. The lack of capitalization in your messages is not a major peeve for me[1], but I was very aware that it annoyed many other people. (...) So get them. Look at how the (...) (25 years ago, 13-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
146 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
