Subject:
|
Re: New primitive: Pneumatic nozzle?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Fri, 6 Aug 1999 11:43:13 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
837 times
|
| |
|
|
"Fredrik Glöckner" wrote:
>
> So my question is this: Does it make sense to suggest that this nozzle
> thingey gets it's own primitive? Oh, and what English word is best to
> describe it? Is "nozzle" OK, or is it just hideous? I'm don't know too
> much technical English, so I wouldn't know.
It's not used in many parts so maybe there's no need to make a
primitive for it but you could make it a subpart that goes into the
parts/s directory and can be shared with the other pneumatic parts.
Leonardo
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | New primitive: Pneumatic nozzle?
|
| I'm currenly working on the Technic Pneumatic Airtank (view the progress at <URL:(URL), if you want to) and I just realized that there is one element which is common in all pneumatic parts: The "tap"/"nozzle" thingey to which you connect the rubber (...) (25 years ago, 5-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
3 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
