Subject:
|
Re: LDLITE and Door Part Problems- Sorry so big
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Thu, 22 Jul 1999 09:36:18 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1107 times
|
| |
|
|
On Thu, 22 Jul 1999 04:45:01 GMT, "Adam Howard" <abhoward10@hotmail.com> wrote:
> This is for anyone who is experienced with LDLITE:
> I have submitted 2 door parts 2400 and 6105 to Terry for the next vote.
> They work fine in LDRAW, but when he tested them in LDLITE he noticed a
> syntax error. Following is what he noticed:
>
> "Both of these parts have some kind of syntax problem. If you run LDLite
> with the -L switch, it will generate an error log 'ldlite.log' which
> indicates a syntax error on a specific line.
> For some reason, it changes each time you run it, and often the lines are
> non-existent. I am not sure what the problem could be, but I suggest that
> you ask about it on cad.dev. - hopefully someone there knows what the
> problem is.
>
> -- Terry K --"
In these two particular cases, I found what the problem was. Some of you might
already be aware of this problem, but it was new to me.
In the original parts, I had moved the statement "(CW Quads)" down a couple of
lines. In doing so, I had to add a "0" to comment it. The error occured
because I did not leave a space between the "0" and the "(CW Quads)":
0(CW Quads) should be:
0 (CW Quads)
I figured out that any comment line not having a space after the "0" will get a
Syntax error in LDLite with the -L option on.
Annoyingly hard to find. Especially since these files use that new box3#8p.dat
primitive, and I recall that primitive being involved in a similar Syntax error
problem with an earlier version of LDLite. So I spent a lot of time on a false
trail thinking this problem was related.
The moral of the story? Avoid spamcake when editing files.
-- Terry K --
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | LDLITE and Door Part Problems- Sorry so big [DAT]
|
| This is for anyone who is experienced with LDLITE: I have submitted 2 door parts 2400 and 6105 to Terry for the next vote. They work fine in LDRAW, but when he tested them in LDLITE he noticed a syntax error. Following is what he noticed: "Both of (...) (26 years ago, 22-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
2 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
