Subject:
|
Re: permission to create monorail and fabuland catogories?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Thu, 22 Jul 1999 05:45:37 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
833 times
|
| |
|
|
Sounds like that would go in the Plate category to me. Adding the word
train means it hasn't, currently is not, and never will be used by any other
lego model except for a train. I'm not sure what the part looks like, but
if it is a plate then that's where it should go. I'd hate to find this part
in some future space or castle set and look thorough the plate category, not
be able to find it, and believe it hasn't been ldrawn before.
Just my 2cents,
Adam
John VanZwieten <john_vanzwieten@email.msn.com> wrote in message
news:FF4EF0.57w@lugnet.com...
>
> Terry K <legoverse@geocities.com> wrote in message • news:379177a8.1922900@lugnet.com...
> > On Sat, 17 Jul 1999 10:48:25 GMT, Jonathan Wilson <wilsonj@xoommail.com> • wrote:
> >
> > > permission to create monorail and fabuland catogories?
> > > i have several parts that i may ldraw and that is the best place to put
> > > them e.g. fabuland carosel top and monorail wagon plate.
> >
> > I am really not to keen on the idea of a 'Monorail' category. How much • would
> > go into it? Are there enough monorail specific pieces to justify an • entire
> > category? Or better to place them in an existing category or something • like
> > the 'Equipment' area?
>
>
> How about just the Train category? "Train Monorail Wagon Plate"
>
> -John Van
>
>
>
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
7 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
