 | | Re: DAT voting page up —John VanZwieten
|
| | | A note on the 9V Mini-motor: There is a box3#8.dat primitive which Ldlite is currently unable to draw. This primitive forms the wire notch on the top of the motor, but since the voting page is done with Ldlite, a hole exixts. Terry, maybe you could (...) (26 years ago, 23-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: DAT voting page up —Terry Keller
|
| | | | | (...) Do you think it is really required to inline it? I was under the impression that the next release of ldlite would address the 3#8 problem. -- Terry K -- (26 years ago, 24-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: DAT voting page up —Patrick Sayre-Little
|
| | | | | | I apologize in advance if I missed the discussion on this, but is the word "pattern" at the end of lots of the parts really necessary? It seems rather redundant. Especially in parts that already have "logo" in their names. Also, maybe the "needs (...) (26 years ago, 25-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: DAT voting page up —Terry Keller
|
| | | | | | (...) Well, "Pattern" just sort of became a standard way of identifying a patterned part. "Logo" I think should refer more to a specific type of pattern. Necessary? I don't know. But I seem to be blindly following the convention. (...) In a perfect (...) (26 years ago, 25-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: DAT voting page up —Leonardo Zide
|
| | | | (...) I searched all parts here and couldn't find any that uses the box3#8 primitive. Where it is used ? Leonardo (26 years ago, 24-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | |
