 | | Re: can we please work out what to do about the black castle wall pieces?
|
|
Chris Dee <chris_w_dee@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:FDu12p.3I1@lugnet.com... (...) meant (...) proof (...) Nice piece of deductive reasoning, Sherlok. -John Van (25 years ago, 24-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: "Well-Formed" LDraw (Was: regular expressions for DAT file subpart lines)
|
|
(...) Both of the above are common output from LDAO code. (...) Well, I was just throwing stuff out. I don't know if LDraw would take that one, or not. (...) Darned context-sensitive constructions. (...) I didn't say they made sense. Just that they (...) (25 years ago, 24-Jun-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: url for the parts tracker?
|
|
(...) But if it was moved, the script could be refined so that things could be modified or removed as necessary, instead of just adding more info. Jeff (25 years ago, 24-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: can we please work out what to do about the black castle wall pieces?
|
|
(...) with #7 (...) stones (...) Whew... this was difficult to read until I deduced that "3!6 with 38" was meant to read "#16 with #8" (I think). Any chance you can take a little time to proof read your messages ? It would help us to help you. Chris (25 years ago, 24-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: LDAO Suggestion Mark 2
|
|
(...) Hey Steve! That is *exactly* what I was thinking! (and I can't think of anytime when you said it, so if you did, I must've missed it.) That would be the way I'd like it done. I think it would make a cleaner directory tree. Jeff P.S. I hope you (...) (25 years ago, 24-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
