 | | Re: can we please work out what to do about the black castle wall pieces?
|
|
(...) That was the the ones with the light gray stones, correct? As opposed to the dark gray stones we now have. So, if we make a #16 version of the wall with light gray (#7) stones, the stones would not normally be visible. This would be a little (...) (25 years ago, 23-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: can we please work out what to do about the black castle wall pieces?
|
|
good ieda. we simply put 4444p??.dat in 3!6 with 38 pattern and also in #16 with #7 pattern. as for names something like castle wall x by x by x with scattered stones pattern in light grey??? (25 years ago, 24-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: can we please work out what to do about the black castle wall pieces?
|
|
(...) (25 years ago, 24-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: can we please work out what to do about the black castle wall pieces?
|
|
(...) with #7 (...) stones (...) Whew... this was difficult to read until I deduced that "3!6 with 38" was meant to read "#16 with #8" (I think). Any chance you can take a little time to proof read your messages ? It would help us to help you. Chris (25 years ago, 24-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: can we please work out what to do about the black castle wall pieces?
|
|
Chris Dee <chris_w_dee@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:FDu12p.3I1@lugnet.com... (...) meant (...) proof (...) Nice piece of deductive reasoning, Sherlok. -John Van (25 years ago, 24-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: can we please work out what to do about the black castle wall pieces?
|
|
(...) Unfortunately, we've been asking him to do this for the past couple months, and he has yet to listen. Along with proofreading, we've asked him to keep the message body text from the previous message. *Sigh* Jeff (25 years ago, 24-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
